[dpdk-dev] app/test: fix crash of lpm test

  The test recently added accesses to lpm->tbl8[ip >> 8] with is much
larger than the size of the table, causing a crash of the test
application.

Fix this typo by replacing tbl8 by tbl24.

Fixes: 231fa88ed522 ("app/test: verify LPM tbl8 recycle")

Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---

Hi Wei,

I don't know lpm very well and I did not spend much time to understand
the test case. I guess that's the proper fix, but please check carefully
that I'm not doing something wrong :)

Thanks,
Olivier


 app/test/test_lpm.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  

Hi, Oliver

Thanks for your catching this bug.
After reviewing related codes, I can acknowledge it.

Thanks
-Wei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 9:08 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Dai, Wei <wei.dai@intel.com>
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] app/test: fix crash of lpm test
> 
> The test recently added accesses to lpm->tbl8[ip >> 8] with is much larger than
> the size of the table, causing a crash of the test application.
> 
> Fix this typo by replacing tbl8 by tbl24.
> 
> Fixes: 231fa88ed522 ("app/test: verify LPM tbl8 recycle")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Acked-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intle.com>

> ---
> 
> Hi Wei,
> 
> I don't know lpm very well and I did not spend much time to understand the
> test case. I guess that's the proper fix, but please check carefully that I'm not
> doing something wrong :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Olivier
> 
> 
>  app/test/test_lpm.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm.c b/app/test/test_lpm.c index 80e0efc..41ae80f
> 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_lpm.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_lpm.c
> @@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ test18(void)
>  	rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
> 
>  	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid_group);
> -	tbl8_group_index = lpm->tbl8[ip>>8].group_idx;
> +	tbl8_group_index = lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].group_idx;
> 
>  	depth = 23;
>  	next_hop = 2;
> @@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ test18(void)
>  	rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
> 
>  	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid_group);
> -	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(tbl8_group_index == lpm->tbl8[ip>>8].group_idx);
> +	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(tbl8_group_index == lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].group_idx);
> 
>  	depth = 24;
>  	next_hop = 4;
> @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ test18(void)
>  	rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
> 
>  	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid_group);
> -	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(tbl8_group_index == lpm->tbl8[ip>>8].group_idx);
> +	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(tbl8_group_index == lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].group_idx);
> 
>  	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>  #undef group_idx
> --
> 2.8.1
  

> > The test recently added accesses to lpm->tbl8[ip >> 8] with is much larger than
> > the size of the table, causing a crash of the test application.
> > 
> > Fix this typo by replacing tbl8 by tbl24.
> > 
> > Fixes: 231fa88ed522 ("app/test: verify LPM tbl8 recycle")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> Acked-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intle.com>

Applied, thanks