[dpdk-dev,v2,16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent filter
Checks
Commit Message
This patch adds a function to create the flow directory filter.
Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
---
v2:
--add new error set function
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 240 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 5 +
2 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 3:53 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
> <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent filter
>
> This patch adds a function to create the flow directory filter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2:
> --add new error set function
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 240
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 5 +
> 2 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> index c98aa0d..1c857fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -468,6 +468,11 @@ ixgbe_flow_validate(__rte_unused struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> struct rte_flow_error *error);
> +static struct rte_flow *ixgbe_flow_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> + const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> + const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> + const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
> static int ixgbe_flow_flush(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> struct rte_flow_error *error);
> /*
> @@ -850,11 +855,55 @@ static const struct rte_ixgbe_xstats_name_off
> rte_ixgbevf_stats_strings[] = {
> sizeof(rte_ixgbevf_stats_strings[0]))
> static const struct rte_flow_ops ixgbe_flow_ops = {
> ixgbe_flow_validate,
> - NULL,
> + ixgbe_flow_create,
> NULL,
> ixgbe_flow_flush,
> NULL,
> };
> +/* ntuple filter list structure */
> +struct ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele {
> + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele) entries;
> + struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter filter_info; };
> +/* ethertype filter list structure */
> +struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele {
> + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele) entries;
> + struct rte_eth_ethertype_filter filter_info; };
> +/* syn filter list structure */
> +struct ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele {
> + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele) entries;
> + struct rte_eth_syn_filter filter_info; };
> +/* fdir filter list structure */
> +struct ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele {
> + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele) entries;
> + struct ixgbe_fdir_rule filter_info;
> +};
> +/* l2_tunnel filter list structure */
> +struct ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele {
> + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele) entries;
> + struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf filter_info; };
> +/* ixgbe_flow memory list structure */
Why need to define these structures? There has been structures to store the filter before, isn't it?
> +struct ixgbe_flow_mem {
> + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_flow_mem) entries;
> + struct ixgbe_flow *flow;
> +};
> +
> +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_ntuple_filter_list, ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele); struct
> +ixgbe_ntuple_filter_list filter_ntuple_list;
> +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_ethertype_filter_list, ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele);
> +struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_list filter_ethertype_list;
> +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_syn_filter_list, ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele); struct
> +ixgbe_syn_filter_list filter_syn_list;
> +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_fdir_rule_filter_list, ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele); struct
> +ixgbe_fdir_rule_filter_list filter_fdir_list;
> +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_l2_tunnel_filter_list, ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele);
> +struct ixgbe_l2_tunnel_filter_list filter_l2_tunnel_list;
> +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_flow_mem_list, ixgbe_flow_mem); struct
> +ixgbe_flow_mem_list ixgbe_flow_list;
> +
> /**
> * Atomically reads the link status information from global
> * structure rte_eth_dev.
> @@ -1380,6 +1429,14 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>
> /* initialize l2 tunnel filter list & hash */
> ixgbe_l2_tn_filter_init(eth_dev);
> +
> + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ntuple_list);
> + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ethertype_list);
> + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_syn_list);
> + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_fdir_list);
> + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_l2_tunnel_list);
> + TAILQ_INIT(&ixgbe_flow_list);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Hi ,beilei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:34 AM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent filter
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
> > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 3:53 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
> > <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent
> > filter
> >
> > This patch adds a function to create the flow directory filter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > --add new error set function
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 240
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 5 +
> > 2 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > @@ -1380,6 +1429,14 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev
> *eth_dev)
> >
> > /* initialize l2 tunnel filter list & hash */
> > ixgbe_l2_tn_filter_init(eth_dev);
> > +
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ntuple_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ethertype_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_syn_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_fdir_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_l2_tunnel_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&ixgbe_flow_list);
>
> You need to destroy these lists in dev_unint function.
>
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
Yes, I have add a function ixgbe_filterlist_flush() in 18/18 in dev_unint patch to flush these list.
Hi,beilei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:04 AM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
> <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent filter
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
> > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 3:53 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
> > <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent
> > filter
> >
> > This patch adds a function to create the flow directory filter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > --add new error set function
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 240
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 5 +
> > 2 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > index c98aa0d..1c857fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > @@ -468,6 +468,11 @@ ixgbe_flow_validate(__rte_unused struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> > const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> > struct rte_flow_error *error);
> > +static struct rte_flow *ixgbe_flow_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > + const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> > + const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> > + const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> > + struct rte_flow_error *error);
> > static int ixgbe_flow_flush(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > struct rte_flow_error *error);
> > /*
> > @@ -850,11 +855,55 @@ static const struct rte_ixgbe_xstats_name_off
> > rte_ixgbevf_stats_strings[] = {
> > sizeof(rte_ixgbevf_stats_strings[0]))
> > static const struct rte_flow_ops ixgbe_flow_ops = {
> > ixgbe_flow_validate,
> > - NULL,
> > + ixgbe_flow_create,
> > NULL,
> > ixgbe_flow_flush,
> > NULL,
> > };
> > +/* ntuple filter list structure */
> > +struct ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele {
> > + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele) entries;
> > + struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter filter_info; };
> > +/* ethertype filter list structure */ struct
> > +ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele {
> > + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele) entries;
> > + struct rte_eth_ethertype_filter filter_info; };
> > +/* syn filter list structure */
> > +struct ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele {
> > + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele) entries;
> > + struct rte_eth_syn_filter filter_info; };
> > +/* fdir filter list structure */
> > +struct ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele {
> > + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele) entries;
> > + struct ixgbe_fdir_rule filter_info;
> > +};
> > +/* l2_tunnel filter list structure */ struct
> > +ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele {
> > + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele) entries;
> > + struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf filter_info; };
> > +/* ixgbe_flow memory list structure */
>
> Why need to define these structures? There has been structures to store the
> filter before, isn't it?
>
These list are created to store flow parameters, which is required by rte layer.
> > +struct ixgbe_flow_mem {
> > + TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_flow_mem) entries;
> > + struct ixgbe_flow *flow;
> > +};
> > +
> > +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_ntuple_filter_list, ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele); struct
> > +ixgbe_ntuple_filter_list filter_ntuple_list;
> > +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_ethertype_filter_list, ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele);
> > +struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_list filter_ethertype_list;
> > +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_syn_filter_list, ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele); struct
> > +ixgbe_syn_filter_list filter_syn_list;
> > +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_fdir_rule_filter_list, ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele); struct
> > +ixgbe_fdir_rule_filter_list filter_fdir_list;
> > +TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_l2_tunnel_filter_list,
> > +ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele); struct ixgbe_l2_tunnel_filter_list
> > +filter_l2_tunnel_list; TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_flow_mem_list,
> > +ixgbe_flow_mem); struct ixgbe_flow_mem_list ixgbe_flow_list;
> > +
> > /**
> > * Atomically reads the link status information from global
> > * structure rte_eth_dev.
> > @@ -1380,6 +1429,14 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev
> *eth_dev)
> >
> > /* initialize l2 tunnel filter list & hash */
> > ixgbe_l2_tn_filter_init(eth_dev);
> > +
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ntuple_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ethertype_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_syn_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_fdir_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&filter_l2_tunnel_list);
> > + TAILQ_INIT(&ixgbe_flow_list);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 3:53 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
> <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent filter
>
> This patch adds a function to create the flow directory filter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
>
> +/**
> + * Create or destroy a flow rule.
> + * Theorically one rule can match more than one filters.
> + * We will let it use the filter which it hitt first.
> + * So, the sequence matters.
> + */
> +static struct rte_flow *
> +ixgbe_flow_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> + const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> + const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> + const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> + struct rte_flow_error *error)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter ntuple_filter;
> + struct rte_eth_ethertype_filter ethertype_filter;
> + struct rte_eth_syn_filter syn_filter;
> + struct ixgbe_fdir_rule fdir_rule;
> + struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf l2_tn_filter;
> + struct ixgbe_hw_fdir_info *fdir_info =
> + IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_FDIR_INFO(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> + struct ixgbe_flow *flow = NULL;
> + struct ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele *ntuple_filter_ptr;
> + struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele *ethertype_filter_ptr;
> + struct ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele *syn_filter_ptr;
> + struct ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele *l2_tn_filter_ptr;
> + struct ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele *fdir_rule_ptr;
> + struct ixgbe_flow_mem *ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr;
> +
> + flow = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_flow", sizeof(struct ixgbe_flow), 0);
> + if (!flow) {
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "failed to allocate memory");
> + return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
> + }
> + ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_flow_mem",
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_flow_mem), 0);
> + if (!ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr) {
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "failed to allocate memory");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr->flow = flow;
> + TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ixgbe_flow_list,
> + ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr, entries);
> +
> + memset(&ntuple_filter, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter));
> + ret = ixgbe_parse_ntuple_filter(attr, pattern,
> + actions, &ntuple_filter, error);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = ixgbe_add_del_ntuple_filter(dev, &ntuple_filter, TRUE);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ntuple_filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_ntuple_filter",
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele), 0);
> + (void)rte_memcpy(&ntuple_filter_ptr->filter_info,
> + &ntuple_filter,
> + sizeof(struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter));
> + TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_ntuple_list,
> + ntuple_filter_ptr, entries);
> + flow->rule = ntuple_filter_ptr;
> + flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_NTUPLE;
> + }
> + return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
Should the return statement be in the parantheses above?
And is there any process if (ret<0) ?
> + }
> +
> + memset(ðertype_filter, 0, sizeof(struct
> rte_eth_ethertype_filter));
> + ret = ixgbe_parse_ethertype_filter(attr, pattern,
> + actions, ðertype_filter, error);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = ixgbe_add_del_ethertype_filter(dev,
> + ðertype_filter, TRUE);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ethertype_filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc(
> + "ixgbe_ethertype_filter",
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele), 0);
> + (void)rte_memcpy(ðertype_filter_ptr-
> >filter_info,
> + ðertype_filter,
> + sizeof(struct rte_eth_ethertype_filter));
> + TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_ethertype_list,
> + ethertype_filter_ptr, entries);
> + flow->rule = ethertype_filter_ptr;
> + flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_ETHERTYPE;
> + }
> + return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
Same above.
> + }
> +
> + memset(&syn_filter, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_syn_filter));
> + ret = cons_parse_syn_filter(attr, pattern, actions, &syn_filter, error);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = ixgbe_syn_filter_set(dev, &syn_filter, TRUE);
> + if (!ret) {
> + syn_filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_syn_filter",
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele), 0);
> + (void)rte_memcpy(&syn_filter_ptr->filter_info,
> + &syn_filter,
> + sizeof(struct rte_eth_syn_filter));
> + TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_syn_list,
> + syn_filter_ptr,
> + entries);
> + flow->rule = syn_filter_ptr;
> + flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_SYN;
> + }
> + return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
Same above.
> + }
> +
> + memset(&fdir_rule, 0, sizeof(struct ixgbe_fdir_rule));
> + ret = ixgbe_parse_fdir_filter(attr, pattern,
> + actions, &fdir_rule, error);
> + if (!ret) {
> + /* A mask cannot be deleted. */
> + if (fdir_rule.b_mask) {
> + if (!fdir_info->mask_added) {
> + /* It's the first time the mask is set. */
> + rte_memcpy(&fdir_info->mask,
> + &fdir_rule.mask,
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_hw_fdir_mask));
> + ret = ixgbe_fdir_set_input_mask(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return NULL;
Before return NULL, ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr and flow should be freed, right?
And ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr should be removed from ixgbe_flow_list. Or you can move TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ixgbe_flow_list, ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr, entries) after a flow is added successfully.
Same comments for "return NULL" below.
> +
> + fdir_info->mask_added = TRUE;
> + } else {
> + /**
> + * Only support one global mask,
> + * all the masks should be the same.
> + */
> + ret = memcmp(&fdir_info->mask,
> + &fdir_rule.mask,
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_hw_fdir_mask));
> + if (ret)
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (fdir_rule.b_spec) {
> + ret = ixgbe_fdir_filter_program(dev, &fdir_rule,
> + FALSE, FALSE);
> + if (!ret) {
> + fdir_rule_ptr =
> rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_fdir_filter",
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele), 0);
> + (void)rte_memcpy(&fdir_rule_ptr-
> >filter_info,
> + &fdir_rule,
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_fdir_rule));
> + TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_fdir_list,
> + fdir_rule_ptr, entries);
> + flow->rule = fdir_rule_ptr;
> + flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_FDIR;
> +
> + return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
Why to return NULL here?
> + }
> +
> + memset(&l2_tn_filter, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf));
> + ret = cons_parse_l2_tn_filter(attr, pattern,
> + actions, &l2_tn_filter, error);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = ixgbe_dev_l2_tunnel_filter_add(dev, &l2_tn_filter,
> FALSE);
> + if (!ret) {
> + l2_tn_filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_l2_tn_filter",
> + sizeof(struct ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele),
> 0);
> + (void)rte_memcpy(&l2_tn_filter_ptr->filter_info,
> + &l2_tn_filter,
> + sizeof(struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf));
> + TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_l2_tunnel_list,
> + l2_tn_filter_ptr, entries);
> + flow->rule = l2_tn_filter_ptr;
> + flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_L2_TUNNEL;
> +
> + return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
> + }
is there any process if (ret<0) ?
> + }
> +
> + rte_free(ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr);
> + rte_free(flow);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
On 12/30/2016 7:53 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> This patch adds a function to create the flow directory filter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2:
> --add new error set function
> ---
<...>
>
> +struct ixgbe_flow {
> + enum rte_filter_type filter_type;
> + void *rule;
> +};
It is possible to rename this struct to rte_flow, to prevent casting.
Although functionally there is no difference.
> +
> /*
> * Structure to store private data for each driver instance (for each port).
> */
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 1:27 AM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent filter
>
> On 12/30/2016 7:53 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> > This patch adds a function to create the flow directory filter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > --add new error set function
> > ---
>
> <...>
>
> >
> > +struct ixgbe_flow {
> > + enum rte_filter_type filter_type;
> > + void *rule;
> > +};
>
> It is possible to rename this struct to rte_flow, to prevent casting.
> Although functionally there is no difference.
Ok, I will do that in v3
>
> > +
> > /*
> > * Structure to store private data for each driver instance (for each port).
> > */
> >
@@ -468,6 +468,11 @@ ixgbe_flow_validate(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
struct rte_flow_error *error);
+static struct rte_flow *ixgbe_flow_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
+ const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
+ const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
+ const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
+ struct rte_flow_error *error);
static int ixgbe_flow_flush(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
struct rte_flow_error *error);
/*
@@ -850,11 +855,55 @@ static const struct rte_ixgbe_xstats_name_off rte_ixgbevf_stats_strings[] = {
sizeof(rte_ixgbevf_stats_strings[0]))
static const struct rte_flow_ops ixgbe_flow_ops = {
ixgbe_flow_validate,
- NULL,
+ ixgbe_flow_create,
NULL,
ixgbe_flow_flush,
NULL,
};
+/* ntuple filter list structure */
+struct ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele {
+ TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele) entries;
+ struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter filter_info;
+};
+/* ethertype filter list structure */
+struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele {
+ TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele) entries;
+ struct rte_eth_ethertype_filter filter_info;
+};
+/* syn filter list structure */
+struct ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele {
+ TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele) entries;
+ struct rte_eth_syn_filter filter_info;
+};
+/* fdir filter list structure */
+struct ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele {
+ TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele) entries;
+ struct ixgbe_fdir_rule filter_info;
+};
+/* l2_tunnel filter list structure */
+struct ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele {
+ TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele) entries;
+ struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf filter_info;
+};
+/* ixgbe_flow memory list structure */
+struct ixgbe_flow_mem {
+ TAILQ_ENTRY(ixgbe_flow_mem) entries;
+ struct ixgbe_flow *flow;
+};
+
+TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_ntuple_filter_list, ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele);
+struct ixgbe_ntuple_filter_list filter_ntuple_list;
+TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_ethertype_filter_list, ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele);
+struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_list filter_ethertype_list;
+TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_syn_filter_list, ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele);
+struct ixgbe_syn_filter_list filter_syn_list;
+TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_fdir_rule_filter_list, ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele);
+struct ixgbe_fdir_rule_filter_list filter_fdir_list;
+TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_l2_tunnel_filter_list, ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele);
+struct ixgbe_l2_tunnel_filter_list filter_l2_tunnel_list;
+TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_flow_mem_list, ixgbe_flow_mem);
+struct ixgbe_flow_mem_list ixgbe_flow_list;
+
/**
* Atomically reads the link status information from global
* structure rte_eth_dev.
@@ -1380,6 +1429,14 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
/* initialize l2 tunnel filter list & hash */
ixgbe_l2_tn_filter_init(eth_dev);
+
+ TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ntuple_list);
+ TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ethertype_list);
+ TAILQ_INIT(&filter_syn_list);
+ TAILQ_INIT(&filter_fdir_list);
+ TAILQ_INIT(&filter_l2_tunnel_list);
+ TAILQ_INIT(&ixgbe_flow_list);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -10334,6 +10391,187 @@ ixgbe_flow_validate(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
return ret;
}
+/**
+ * Create or destroy a flow rule.
+ * Theorically one rule can match more than one filters.
+ * We will let it use the filter which it hitt first.
+ * So, the sequence matters.
+ */
+static struct rte_flow *
+ixgbe_flow_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
+ const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
+ const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
+ const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
+ struct rte_flow_error *error)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter ntuple_filter;
+ struct rte_eth_ethertype_filter ethertype_filter;
+ struct rte_eth_syn_filter syn_filter;
+ struct ixgbe_fdir_rule fdir_rule;
+ struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf l2_tn_filter;
+ struct ixgbe_hw_fdir_info *fdir_info =
+ IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_FDIR_INFO(dev->data->dev_private);
+ struct ixgbe_flow *flow = NULL;
+ struct ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele *ntuple_filter_ptr;
+ struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele *ethertype_filter_ptr;
+ struct ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele *syn_filter_ptr;
+ struct ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele *l2_tn_filter_ptr;
+ struct ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele *fdir_rule_ptr;
+ struct ixgbe_flow_mem *ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr;
+
+ flow = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_flow", sizeof(struct ixgbe_flow), 0);
+ if (!flow) {
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "failed to allocate memory");
+ return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
+ }
+ ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_flow_mem",
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_flow_mem), 0);
+ if (!ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr) {
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "failed to allocate memory");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr->flow = flow;
+ TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ixgbe_flow_list,
+ ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr, entries);
+
+ memset(&ntuple_filter, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter));
+ ret = ixgbe_parse_ntuple_filter(attr, pattern,
+ actions, &ntuple_filter, error);
+ if (!ret) {
+ ret = ixgbe_add_del_ntuple_filter(dev, &ntuple_filter, TRUE);
+ if (!ret) {
+ ntuple_filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_ntuple_filter",
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele), 0);
+ (void)rte_memcpy(&ntuple_filter_ptr->filter_info,
+ &ntuple_filter,
+ sizeof(struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter));
+ TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_ntuple_list,
+ ntuple_filter_ptr, entries);
+ flow->rule = ntuple_filter_ptr;
+ flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_NTUPLE;
+ }
+ return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
+ }
+
+ memset(ðertype_filter, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_ethertype_filter));
+ ret = ixgbe_parse_ethertype_filter(attr, pattern,
+ actions, ðertype_filter, error);
+ if (!ret) {
+ ret = ixgbe_add_del_ethertype_filter(dev,
+ ðertype_filter, TRUE);
+ if (!ret) {
+ ethertype_filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc(
+ "ixgbe_ethertype_filter",
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele), 0);
+ (void)rte_memcpy(ðertype_filter_ptr->filter_info,
+ ðertype_filter,
+ sizeof(struct rte_eth_ethertype_filter));
+ TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_ethertype_list,
+ ethertype_filter_ptr, entries);
+ flow->rule = ethertype_filter_ptr;
+ flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_ETHERTYPE;
+ }
+ return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
+ }
+
+ memset(&syn_filter, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_syn_filter));
+ ret = cons_parse_syn_filter(attr, pattern, actions, &syn_filter, error);
+ if (!ret) {
+ ret = ixgbe_syn_filter_set(dev, &syn_filter, TRUE);
+ if (!ret) {
+ syn_filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_syn_filter",
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele), 0);
+ (void)rte_memcpy(&syn_filter_ptr->filter_info,
+ &syn_filter,
+ sizeof(struct rte_eth_syn_filter));
+ TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_syn_list,
+ syn_filter_ptr,
+ entries);
+ flow->rule = syn_filter_ptr;
+ flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_SYN;
+ }
+ return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
+ }
+
+ memset(&fdir_rule, 0, sizeof(struct ixgbe_fdir_rule));
+ ret = ixgbe_parse_fdir_filter(attr, pattern,
+ actions, &fdir_rule, error);
+ if (!ret) {
+ /* A mask cannot be deleted. */
+ if (fdir_rule.b_mask) {
+ if (!fdir_info->mask_added) {
+ /* It's the first time the mask is set. */
+ rte_memcpy(&fdir_info->mask,
+ &fdir_rule.mask,
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_hw_fdir_mask));
+ ret = ixgbe_fdir_set_input_mask(dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return NULL;
+
+ fdir_info->mask_added = TRUE;
+ } else {
+ /**
+ * Only support one global mask,
+ * all the masks should be the same.
+ */
+ ret = memcmp(&fdir_info->mask,
+ &fdir_rule.mask,
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_hw_fdir_mask));
+ if (ret)
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (fdir_rule.b_spec) {
+ ret = ixgbe_fdir_filter_program(dev, &fdir_rule,
+ FALSE, FALSE);
+ if (!ret) {
+ fdir_rule_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_fdir_filter",
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele), 0);
+ (void)rte_memcpy(&fdir_rule_ptr->filter_info,
+ &fdir_rule,
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_fdir_rule));
+ TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_fdir_list,
+ fdir_rule_ptr, entries);
+ flow->rule = fdir_rule_ptr;
+ flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_FDIR;
+
+ return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
+ }
+
+ if (ret)
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ memset(&l2_tn_filter, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf));
+ ret = cons_parse_l2_tn_filter(attr, pattern,
+ actions, &l2_tn_filter, error);
+ if (!ret) {
+ ret = ixgbe_dev_l2_tunnel_filter_add(dev, &l2_tn_filter, FALSE);
+ if (!ret) {
+ l2_tn_filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ixgbe_l2_tn_filter",
+ sizeof(struct ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele), 0);
+ (void)rte_memcpy(&l2_tn_filter_ptr->filter_info,
+ &l2_tn_filter,
+ sizeof(struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf));
+ TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&filter_l2_tunnel_list,
+ l2_tn_filter_ptr, entries);
+ flow->rule = l2_tn_filter_ptr;
+ flow->filter_type = RTE_ETH_FILTER_L2_TUNNEL;
+
+ return (struct rte_flow *)flow;
+ }
+ }
+
+ rte_free(ixgbe_flow_mem_ptr);
+ rte_free(flow);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI(net_ixgbe, rte_ixgbe_pmd.pci_drv);
RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(net_ixgbe, pci_id_ixgbe_map);
RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_ixgbe, "* igb_uio | uio_pci_generic | vfio");
@@ -329,6 +329,11 @@ struct ixgbe_l2_tn_info {
bool e_tag_ether_type; /* ether type for e-tag */
};
+struct ixgbe_flow {
+ enum rte_filter_type filter_type;
+ void *rule;
+};
+
/*
* Structure to store private data for each driver instance (for each port).
*/