[dpdk-dev] net/virtio-user: fix overflow
Checks
Commit Message
This commit fixes an array overflow when number of queues is higher than 8.
Fixes: 37a7eb2ae816 ("net/virtio-user: add device emulation layer")
Signed-off-by: Wenfeng Liu <liuwf@arraynetworks.com.cn>
---
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h | 3 ++-
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h | 6 +++---
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 7 +++++++
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Comments
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:09:15PM +0000, Wenfeng Liu wrote:
> This commit fixes an array overflow when number of queues is higher than 8.
Firstly, this commit log could be a bit more informative, to something
like:
virtio-user limits the qeueue number to 8 but provides no limit
check against the queue number input from user. If a bigger queue
number (> 8) is given, there is an overflow issue. Doing a sanity
check could avoid it.
>
> Fixes: 37a7eb2ae816 ("net/virtio-user: add device emulation layer")
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenfeng Liu <liuwf@arraynetworks.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h | 6 +++---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
> index 59e45c4..bd940b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@
> /*
> * Maximum number of virtqueues per device.
> */
> -#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES 8
> +#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS 8
> +#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS * 2 + 1
>
> /* Common configuration */
> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG 1
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> index e7fd65f..5b81676 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ int virtio_user_stop_device(struct virtio_user_dev *dev)
> uint32_t i, q;
>
> dev->vhostfd = -1;
> - for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1; ++i) {
> + for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES; ++i) {
Right, we don't need setup callfd and kickfd for the ctrl-queue.
> dev->kickfds[i] = -1;
> dev->callfds[i] = -1;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
> index 6ecb91e..ba80d05 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ struct virtio_user_dev {
> int *tapfds;
>
> /* for both vhost_user and vhost_kernel */
> - int callfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
> - int kickfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
> + int callfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
> + int kickfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
> int mac_specified;
> uint32_t max_queue_pairs;
> uint32_t queue_pairs;
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct virtio_user_dev {
> uint8_t status;
> uint8_t mac_addr[ETHER_ADDR_LEN];
> char path[PATH_MAX];
> - struct vring vrings[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
> + struct vring vrings[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
Have you actually tested your patch? You are removing the vring for
ctrl-queue, which is wrong to me.
> struct virtio_user_backend_ops *ops;
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> index 16d1526..d476a2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,13 @@
> goto end;
> }
>
> + if (queues > VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "arg %s %u exceeds the limit %u",
> + VIRTIO_USER_ARG_QUEUES_NUM, queues,
> + VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS);
> + goto end;
> + }
Yes, we need this check. So, to me, you were actually doing two things
in this patch:
- check the queue number, to avoid overflow
- remove the callfds and kickfds for ctrl-queue.
That said, please do them in two patches.
Thanks.
--yliu
> +
> eth_dev = virtio_user_eth_dev_alloc(name);
> if (!eth_dev) {
> PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "virtio_user fails to alloc device");
> --
> 1.8.3.1
Hi Yuanhan,
>On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:09:15PM +0000, Wenfeng Liu wrote:
>> This commit fixes an array overflow when number of queues is higher than
8.
>
>Firstly, this commit log could be a bit more informative, to something
>like:
>
> virtio-user limits the qeueue number to 8 but provides no limit
> check against the queue number input from user. If a bigger queue
> number (> 8) is given, there is an overflow issue. Doing a sanity
> check could avoid it.
>
Sure, I will revise the commit log accordingly.
>>
>> Fixes: 37a7eb2ae816 ("net/virtio-user: add device emulation layer")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenfeng Liu <liuwf@arraynetworks.com.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h | 3 ++-
>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h | 6 +++---
>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 7 +++++++
>> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h index 59e45c4..bd940b4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@
>> /*
>> * Maximum number of virtqueues per device.
>> */
>> -#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES 8
>> +#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS 8
>> +#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS * 2 + 1
>>
>> /* Common configuration */
>> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG 1
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> index e7fd65f..5b81676 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ int virtio_user_stop_device(struct virtio_user_dev
*dev)
>> uint32_t i, q;
>>
>> dev->vhostfd = -1;
>> - for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1; ++i) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES; ++i) {
>
>Right, we don't need setup callfd and kickfd for the ctrl-queue.
I did not remove the ctrl-queue. I just redefined the MACRO according to DRY
principle:
#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS * 2 + 1
I noticed that I missed the bracket in the MACRO and will add it in next
version.
>
>> dev->kickfds[i] = -1;
>> dev->callfds[i] = -1;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
>> index 6ecb91e..ba80d05 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
>> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ struct virtio_user_dev {
>> int *tapfds;
>>
>> /* for both vhost_user and vhost_kernel */
>> - int callfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
>> - int kickfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
>> + int callfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
>> + int kickfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
>> int mac_specified;
>> uint32_t max_queue_pairs;
>> uint32_t queue_pairs;
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct virtio_user_dev {
>> uint8_t status;
>> uint8_t mac_addr[ETHER_ADDR_LEN];
>> char path[PATH_MAX];
>> - struct vring vrings[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
>> + struct vring vrings[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
>
>Have you actually tested your patch? You are removing the vring for
ctrl-queue, which is wrong to me.
>
>> struct virtio_user_backend_ops *ops; };
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
>> index 16d1526..d476a2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
>> @@ -433,6 +433,13 @@
>> goto end;
>> }
>>
>> + if (queues > VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS) {
>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "arg %s %u exceeds the limit %u",
>> + VIRTIO_USER_ARG_QUEUES_NUM, queues,
>> + VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS);
>> + goto end;
>> + }
>
>Yes, we need this check. So, to me, you were actually doing two things in
this patch:
>
>- check the queue number, to avoid overflow
>- remove the callfds and kickfds for ctrl-queue.
>
>That said, please do them in two patches.
>
>Thanks.
>
> --yliu
>> +
>> eth_dev = virtio_user_eth_dev_alloc(name);
>> if (!eth_dev) {
>> PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "virtio_user fails to alloc device");
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
Regards,
liuwf
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 04:20:39PM +0800, Wenfeng Liu wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
>
> >On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:09:15PM +0000, Wenfeng Liu wrote:
> >> This commit fixes an array overflow when number of queues is higher than
> 8.
> >
> >Firstly, this commit log could be a bit more informative, to something
> >like:
> >
> > virtio-user limits the qeueue number to 8 but provides no limit
> > check against the queue number input from user. If a bigger queue
> > number (> 8) is given, there is an overflow issue. Doing a sanity
> > check could avoid it.
> >
>
> Sure, I will revise the commit log accordingly.
>
> >>
> >> Fixes: 37a7eb2ae816 ("net/virtio-user: add device emulation layer")
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wenfeng Liu <liuwf@arraynetworks.com.cn>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h | 3 ++-
> >> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h | 6 +++---
> >> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 7 +++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
> >> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h index 59e45c4..bd940b4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
> >> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@
> >> /*
> >> * Maximum number of virtqueues per device.
> >> */
> >> -#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES 8
> >> +#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS 8
> >> +#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS * 2 + 1
> >>
> >> /* Common configuration */
> >> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG 1
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> >> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> >> index e7fd65f..5b81676 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> >> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ int virtio_user_stop_device(struct virtio_user_dev
> *dev)
> >> uint32_t i, q;
> >>
> >> dev->vhostfd = -1;
> >> - for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1; ++i) {
> >> + for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES; ++i) {
> >
> >Right, we don't need setup callfd and kickfd for the ctrl-queue.
>
> I did not remove the ctrl-queue. I just redefined the MACRO according to DRY
> principle:
Oh, right, sorry, I overlooked it. Then for this patch, it's okay to me.
> #define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS * 2 + 1
> I noticed that I missed the bracket in the MACRO and will add it in next
> version.
Yes, please. Also, please put a "Cc: stable@dpdk.org" before your
Signed-of-by: it's a candidate for stable releases.
--yliu
@@ -160,7 +160,8 @@
/*
* Maximum number of virtqueues per device.
*/
-#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES 8
+#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS 8
+#define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS * 2 + 1
/* Common configuration */
#define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG 1
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ int virtio_user_stop_device(struct virtio_user_dev *dev)
uint32_t i, q;
dev->vhostfd = -1;
- for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1; ++i) {
+ for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES; ++i) {
dev->kickfds[i] = -1;
dev->callfds[i] = -1;
}
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ struct virtio_user_dev {
int *tapfds;
/* for both vhost_user and vhost_kernel */
- int callfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
- int kickfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
+ int callfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
+ int kickfds[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
int mac_specified;
uint32_t max_queue_pairs;
uint32_t queue_pairs;
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct virtio_user_dev {
uint8_t status;
uint8_t mac_addr[ETHER_ADDR_LEN];
char path[PATH_MAX];
- struct vring vrings[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES * 2 + 1];
+ struct vring vrings[VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES];
struct virtio_user_backend_ops *ops;
};
@@ -433,6 +433,13 @@
goto end;
}
+ if (queues > VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "arg %s %u exceeds the limit %u",
+ VIRTIO_USER_ARG_QUEUES_NUM, queues,
+ VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUE_PAIRS);
+ goto end;
+ }
+
eth_dev = virtio_user_eth_dev_alloc(name);
if (!eth_dev) {
PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "virtio_user fails to alloc device");