[dpdk-dev,42/53] net/sfc/base: fix probes in licensing support
Checks
Commit Message
From: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
Fixes: 05fce2ce8451 ("net/sfc/base: import libefx licensing")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Comments
On 11/16/2017 12:04 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> From: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
>
What has been fixed here?
If you can provide more details I can amend the commit later.
> Fixes: 05fce2ce8451 ("net/sfc/base: import libefx licensing")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
> index de25c5c..cfff51a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ efx_lic_v1v2_find_key(
> return (found);
>
> fail1:
> - EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
> + EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
>
> return (B_FALSE);
> }
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ efx_lic_v1v2_validate_key(
> fail2:
> EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
> fail1:
> - EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
> + EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
>
> return (B_FALSE);
> }
> @@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ efx_lic_v3_validate_key(
> fail2:
> EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
> fail1:
> - EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
> + EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
>
> return (B_FALSE);
> }
>
On 11/27/2017 10:58 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/16/2017 12:04 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>> From: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
>>
> What has been fixed here?
> If you can provide more details I can amend the commit later.
EFSYS_PROBE1 takes one typed value (in addition to the probe name),
whereas EFSYS_PROBE has just the probe name.
Which to use is determined by the probe name – “fail1” probes are
expected to include the function result.
Thanks,
Andrew.
>> Fixes: 05fce2ce8451 ("net/sfc/base: import libefx licensing")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
>> index de25c5c..cfff51a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
>> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ efx_lic_v1v2_find_key(
>> return (found);
>>
>> fail1:
>> - EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
>> + EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
>>
>> return (B_FALSE);
>> }
>> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ efx_lic_v1v2_validate_key(
>> fail2:
>> EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
>> fail1:
>> - EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
>> + EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
>>
>> return (B_FALSE);
>> }
>> @@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ efx_lic_v3_validate_key(
>> fail2:
>> EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
>> fail1:
>> - EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
>> + EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
>>
>> return (B_FALSE);
>> }
>>
On 11/28/2017 2:17 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 10:58 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 11/16/2017 12:04 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>>> From: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
>>>
>> What has been fixed here?
>> If you can provide more details I can amend the commit later.
>
> EFSYS_PROBE1 takes one typed value (in addition to the probe name),
> whereas EFSYS_PROBE has just the probe name.
>
> Which to use is determined by the probe name – “fail1” probes are
> expected to include the function result.
Commits are amended with shared updates and pushed, this and other ones.
Thanks,
ferruh
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew.
>
>>> Fixes: 05fce2ce8451 ("net/sfc/base: import libefx licensing")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
<...>
On 11/29/2017 12:38 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 2:17 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>> On 11/27/2017 10:58 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2017 12:04 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>>>> From: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
>>>>
>>> What has been fixed here?
>>> If you can provide more details I can amend the commit later.
>> EFSYS_PROBE1 takes one typed value (in addition to the probe name),
>> whereas EFSYS_PROBE has just the probe name.
>>
>> Which to use is determined by the probe name – “fail1” probes are
>> expected to include the function result.
> Commits are amended with shared updates and pushed, this and other ones.
Ferruh, many thanks for review and your notes/questions.
> Thanks,
> ferruh
>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew.
>>
>>>> Fixes: 05fce2ce8451 ("net/sfc/base: import libefx licensing")
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Spender <mspender@solarflare.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> <...>
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ efx_lic_v1v2_find_key(
return (found);
fail1:
- EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
+ EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
return (B_FALSE);
}
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ efx_lic_v1v2_validate_key(
fail2:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
fail1:
- EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
+ EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
return (B_FALSE);
}
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ efx_lic_v3_validate_key(
fail2:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
fail1:
- EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
+ EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
return (B_FALSE);
}