[dpdk-dev,2/2] mbuf: reset nb_segs of chained packet
Checks
Commit Message
Fixes: 139debc42dc0 ("mbuf: move chaining from ip_frag library")
Cc: simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net
Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
---
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.15.0
Comments
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:05:35 +0400
Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fixes: 139debc42dc0 ("mbuf: move chaining from ip_frag library")
> Cc: simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index ce8a05ddf..2126dc94b 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -1828,9 +1828,12 @@ static inline int rte_pktmbuf_chain(struct rte_mbuf *head, struct rte_mbuf *tail
> head->nb_segs += tail->nb_segs;
> head->pkt_len += tail->pkt_len;
>
> - /* pkt_len is only set in the head */
> + /* nb_segs and pkt_len are only set in the head */
> + tail->nb_segs = 1;
> tail->pkt_len = tail->data_len;
>
> + __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(head, 1);
> +
> return 0;
> }
My understanding is that nb_segs and pkt_len are only valid
in head. For other packets in the chain nb_segs and pkt_len
can be anything.
> On Nov 16, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:05:35 +0400
> Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Fixes: 139debc42dc0 ("mbuf: move chaining from ip_frag library")
>> Cc: simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>> index ce8a05ddf..2126dc94b 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>> @@ -1828,9 +1828,12 @@ static inline int rte_pktmbuf_chain(struct rte_mbuf *head, struct rte_mbuf *tail
>> head->nb_segs += tail->nb_segs;
>> head->pkt_len += tail->pkt_len;
>>
>> - /* pkt_len is only set in the head */
>> + /* nb_segs and pkt_len are only set in the head */
>> + tail->nb_segs = 1;
>> tail->pkt_len = tail->data_len;
>>
>> + __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(head, 1);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> My understanding is that nb_segs and pkt_len are only valid
> in head. For other packets in the chain nb_segs and pkt_len
> can be anything.
So why not to keep them in consistency with multi-seg logic?
I mean that pkt_len/nb_segs for the head always have meaning but for
the rest of chain pkt_len is the same as data_len and nb_segs := 1
Hi Ilya,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:15:18PM +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
>
> > On Nov 16, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:05:35 +0400
> > Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Fixes: 139debc42dc0 ("mbuf: move chaining from ip_frag library")
> >> Cc: simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 5 ++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> >> index ce8a05ddf..2126dc94b 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> >> @@ -1828,9 +1828,12 @@ static inline int rte_pktmbuf_chain(struct rte_mbuf *head, struct rte_mbuf *tail
> >> head->nb_segs += tail->nb_segs;
> >> head->pkt_len += tail->pkt_len;
> >>
> >> - /* pkt_len is only set in the head */
> >> + /* nb_segs and pkt_len are only set in the head */
> >> + tail->nb_segs = 1;
> >> tail->pkt_len = tail->data_len;
> >>
> >> + __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(head, 1);
> >> +
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >
> > My understanding is that nb_segs and pkt_len are only valid
> > in head. For other packets in the chain nb_segs and pkt_len
> > can be anything.
>
> So why not to keep them in consistency with multi-seg logic?
> I mean that pkt_len/nb_segs for the head always have meaning but for
> the rest of chain pkt_len is the same as data_len and nb_segs := 1
>
Stephen is right: like most mbuf fields, nb_segs and pkt_len are only
valid for the first mbuf of the chain.
What would be the advantage of changing this?
In addition, I think it would require to do the same change that in many
places, like drivers that build multi-seg mbufs.
If you are fixing an issue, please describe it in the commit log.
Olivier
@@ -1828,9 +1828,12 @@ static inline int rte_pktmbuf_chain(struct rte_mbuf *head, struct rte_mbuf *tail
head->nb_segs += tail->nb_segs;
head->pkt_len += tail->pkt_len;
- /* pkt_len is only set in the head */
+ /* nb_segs and pkt_len are only set in the head */
+ tail->nb_segs = 1;
tail->pkt_len = tail->data_len;
+ __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(head, 1);
+
return 0;
}