[dpdk-dev,v3,2/3] net/failsafe: mitigate data plan atomic operations

Message ID 1513703669-29363-3-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Ferruh Yigit
Headers

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Matan Azrad Dec. 19, 2017, 5:14 p.m. UTC
  Fail-safe uses atomic operations to protect sub-device close operation
calling by host thread in removal time while the removed sub-device
burst functions are still in process by application threads.

Using "set" atomic operations is a liitle bit more efficient than "add"
or "sub" atomic operations because "set" shouldn't read the value and
in fact, it does not need a special atomic mechanism in x86 platforms.

Replace "add 1" and "sub 1" atomic operations by "set 1" and "set 0"
atomic operations.

Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h b/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h
index d81cc3c..4196ece 100644
--- a/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h
+++ b/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h
@@ -269,13 +269,13 @@  int failsafe_eth_lsc_event_callback(uint16_t port_id,
  * a: (rte_atomic64_t)
  */
 #define FS_ATOMIC_P(a) \
-	rte_atomic64_add(&(a), 1)
+	rte_atomic64_set(&(a), 1)
 
 /**
  * a: (rte_atomic64_t)
  */
 #define FS_ATOMIC_V(a) \
-	rte_atomic64_sub(&(a), 1)
+	rte_atomic64_set(&(a), 0)
 
 /**
  * s: (struct sub_device *)