diff mbox

[dpdk-dev] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix corner case for spi value

Message ID 20180111115536.20346-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Pablo de Lara Guarch
Headers

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Akhil Goyal Jan. 11, 2018, 11:55 a.m. UTC 
  application is using index 0 of SA table as error,
with current value of IPSEC_SA_MAX_ENTRIES(128) it can
not support SA with spi = 128, as it uses sa_idx = 0
in the SA table.

With this patch, sa_idx = 0 can also be used.

PS: spi = 0 is an invalid SPI and application throws error
for it.

Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample application")

Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
---
 examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 7 ++++---
 examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c          | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Radu Nicolau Jan. 16, 2018, 11:01 a.m. UTC | #1 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:56 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>;
> hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>; Nicolau, Radu
> <radu.nicolau@intel.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix corner case for spi value
> 
> application is using index 0 of SA table as error, with current value of
> IPSEC_SA_MAX_ENTRIES(128) it can not support SA with spi = 128, as it uses
> sa_idx = 0 in the SA table.
> 
> With this patch, sa_idx = 0 can also be used.
> 
> PS: spi = 0 is an invalid SPI and application throws error for it.
> 
> Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample application")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
De Lara Guarch, Pablo Jan. 17, 2018, 4:54 p.m. UTC | #2 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolau, Radu
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 11:02 AM
> To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>;
> hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix corner case for spi value
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:56 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>;
> > hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> > <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>; Nicolau, Radu
> > <radu.nicolau@intel.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix corner case for spi value
> >
> > application is using index 0 of SA table as error, with current value
> > of
> > IPSEC_SA_MAX_ENTRIES(128) it can not support SA with spi = 128, as it
> > uses sa_idx = 0 in the SA table.
> >
> > With this patch, sa_idx = 0 can also be used.
> >
> > PS: spi = 0 is an invalid SPI and application throws error for it.
> >
> > Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample
> > application")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> > ---
> Acked-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>

CC'ing stable ML.

Applied to dpdk-next-crypto.
Thanks,

Pablo
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
index d6f7b36..4d50e72 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
@@ -420,7 +420,8 @@  inbound_sp_sa(struct sp_ctx *sp, struct sa_ctx *sa, struct traffic_type *ip,
 		}
 
 		sa_idx = ip->res[i] & PROTECT_MASK;
-		if (sa_idx == 0 || !inbound_sa_check(sa, m, sa_idx)) {
+		if (sa_idx >= IPSEC_SA_MAX_ENTRIES ||
+				!inbound_sa_check(sa, m, sa_idx)) {
 			rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -485,9 +486,9 @@  outbound_sp(struct sp_ctx *sp, struct traffic_type *ip,
 	for (i = 0; i < ip->num; i++) {
 		m = ip->pkts[i];
 		sa_idx = ip->res[i] & PROTECT_MASK;
-		if ((ip->res[i] == 0) || (ip->res[i] & DISCARD))
+		if (ip->res[i] & DISCARD)
 			rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
-		else if (sa_idx != 0) {
+		else if (sa_idx < IPSEC_SA_MAX_ENTRIES) {
 			ipsec->res[ipsec->num] = sa_idx;
 			ipsec->pkts[ipsec->num++] = m;
 		} else /* BYPASS */
diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
index 1ae4e2a..25ceea1 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
@@ -240,6 +240,8 @@  parse_sa_tokens(char **tokens, uint32_t n_tokens,
 	APP_CHECK_TOKEN_IS_NUM(tokens, 1, status);
 	if (status->status < 0)
 		return;
+	if (atoi(tokens[1]) == INVALID_SPI)
+		return;
 	rule->spi = atoi(tokens[1]);
 
 	for (ti = 2; ti < n_tokens; ti++) {