[dpdk-dev,4/4] eal: set affinity for control threads
Checks
Commit Message
The management threads must not bother the dataplane or service cores.
Set the affinity of these threads accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_lcore.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On 27-Feb-18 2:46 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> The management threads must not bother the dataplane or service cores.
> Set the affinity of these threads accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> ---
<...>
>
> + set_affinity = 0;
> + CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
> + for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++) {
> + if (eal_cpu_detected(lcore_id) &&
> + rte_lcore_has_role(lcore_id, ROLE_OFF)) {
> + CPU_SET(lcore_id, &cpuset);
> + set_affinity = 1;
> + }
> + }
> + if (set_affinity) {
> + ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(*thread, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> + }
Hi Olivier,
Please correct me if i'm wrong here, but if all detected cores are busy
doing something (such as would be the case if DPDK is run without a
coremask specified), affinity is not set? Maybe set it to master lcore
instead (perhaps unconditionally - we usually recommend not using master
lcore for anything important - perhaps setting it to master core always
would be better, instead of trying to find unused lcores)?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:04:52AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 27-Feb-18 2:46 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > The management threads must not bother the dataplane or service cores.
> > Set the affinity of these threads accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> > ---
>
> <...>
>
> > + set_affinity = 0;
> > + CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
> > + for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++) {
> > + if (eal_cpu_detected(lcore_id) &&
> > + rte_lcore_has_role(lcore_id, ROLE_OFF)) {
> > + CPU_SET(lcore_id, &cpuset);
> > + set_affinity = 1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + if (set_affinity) {
> > + ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(*thread, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> Please correct me if i'm wrong here, but if all detected cores are busy
> doing something (such as would be the case if DPDK is run without a coremask
> specified), affinity is not set? Maybe set it to master lcore instead
> (perhaps unconditionally - we usually recommend not using master lcore for
> anything important - perhaps setting it to master core always would be
> better, instead of trying to find unused lcores)?
Good point and good idea, I will update the patchset.
Thanks,
Olivier
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <rte_memory.h>
#include <rte_log.h>
+#include "eal_private.h"
#include "eal_thread.h"
RTE_DECLARE_PER_LCORE(unsigned , _socket_id);
@@ -169,7 +170,9 @@ rte_ctrl_thread_create(pthread_t *thread, const char *name,
.start_routine = start_routine,
.arg = arg,
};
- int ret;
+ unsigned int lcore_id;
+ rte_cpuset_t cpuset;
+ int set_affinity, ret;
pthread_barrier_init(¶ms.configured, NULL, 2);
@@ -183,6 +186,21 @@ rte_ctrl_thread_create(pthread_t *thread, const char *name,
goto fail;
}
+ set_affinity = 0;
+ CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
+ for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++) {
+ if (eal_cpu_detected(lcore_id) &&
+ rte_lcore_has_role(lcore_id, ROLE_OFF)) {
+ CPU_SET(lcore_id, &cpuset);
+ set_affinity = 1;
+ }
+ }
+ if (set_affinity) {
+ ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(*thread, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
pthread_barrier_wait(¶ms.configured);
return 0;
@@ -249,7 +249,9 @@ int rte_thread_setname(pthread_t id, const char *name);
/**
* Create a control thread.
*
- * Wrapper to pthread_create() and pthread_setname_np().
+ * Wrapper to pthread_create(), pthread_setname_np() and
+ * pthread_setaffinity_np(). The dataplane and service lcores are
+ * excluded from the affinity of the new thread.
*
* @param thread
* Filled with the thread id of the new created thread.