[dpdk-dev] examples/ip_pipeline: fix buffer not null terminated

Message ID 20180416110233.66450-1-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Cristian Dumitrescu
Headers

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation fail Compilation issues

Commit Message

Fan Zhang April 16, 2018, 11:02 a.m. UTC
  Coverity issue: 272572
Fixes: 719374345cee ("examples/ip_pipeline: add action profile objects")

Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
---
 examples/ip_pipeline/action.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Bruce Richardson April 16, 2018, 1:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:02:33PM +0100, Fan Zhang wrote:
> Coverity issue: 272572
> Fixes: 719374345cee ("examples/ip_pipeline: add action profile objects")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  examples/ip_pipeline/action.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> index 77a04fe19..91011ebe8 100644
> --- a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> +++ b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ port_in_action_profile_create(const char *name,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Node fill in */
> -	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name));
> +	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name) - 1);
>  	memcpy(&profile->params, params, sizeof(*params));
>  	profile->ap = ap;

No, this still doesn't null terminate, and is a perfect example of why we
should never use strncpy! Use strlcpy instead.
  
Cristian Dumitrescu May 8, 2018, 2:28 p.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Roy Fan
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 12:03 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; Singh, Jasvinder
> <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] examples/ip_pipeline: fix buffer not null terminated
> 
> Coverity issue: 272572
> Fixes: 719374345cee ("examples/ip_pipeline: add action profile objects")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  examples/ip_pipeline/action.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> index 77a04fe19..91011ebe8 100644
> --- a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> +++ b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ port_in_action_profile_create(const char *name,
>  	}
> 
>  	/* Node fill in */
> -	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name));
> +	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name) - 1);
>  	memcpy(&profile->params, params, sizeof(*params));
>  	profile->ap = ap;
> 
> --
> 2.13.6

Acked-by: Cristian.Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>

Applied to next-pipeline tree, thanks!
  
Bruce Richardson May 8, 2018, 7:51 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:28:25PM +0000, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Roy Fan
> > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 12:03 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; Singh, Jasvinder
> > <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] examples/ip_pipeline: fix buffer not null terminated
> > 
> > Coverity issue: 272572
> > Fixes: 719374345cee ("examples/ip_pipeline: add action profile objects")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  examples/ip_pipeline/action.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> > index 77a04fe19..91011ebe8 100644
> > --- a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> > +++ b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ port_in_action_profile_create(const char *name,
> >  	}
> > 
> >  	/* Node fill in */
> > -	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name));
> > +	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name) - 1);
> >  	memcpy(&profile->params, params, sizeof(*params));
> >  	profile->ap = ap;
> > 
> > --
> > 2.13.6
> 
> Acked-by: Cristian.Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> 
> Applied to next-pipeline tree, thanks!

This is not a correct fix, and the code is still broken. However, I see
that you have actually applied the correct v2 patch to the tree, so no big
deal. It's probably best to reply to the correct patch confirming it's
applied, though.

/Bruce
  
Cristian Dumitrescu May 9, 2018, 9:26 a.m. UTC | #4
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 8:51 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Singh,
> Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ip_pipeline: fix buffer not null
> terminated
> 
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:28:25PM +0000, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Zhang, Roy Fan
> > > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 12:03 PM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; Singh,
> Jasvinder
> > > <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] examples/ip_pipeline: fix buffer not null terminated
> > >
> > > Coverity issue: 272572
> > > Fixes: 719374345cee ("examples/ip_pipeline: add action profile objects")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  examples/ip_pipeline/action.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> > > index 77a04fe19..91011ebe8 100644
> > > --- a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> > > +++ b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
> > > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ port_in_action_profile_create(const char
> *name,
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	/* Node fill in */
> > > -	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name));
> > > +	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name) - 1);
> > >  	memcpy(&profile->params, params, sizeof(*params));
> > >  	profile->ap = ap;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.13.6
> >
> > Acked-by: Cristian.Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> >
> > Applied to next-pipeline tree, thanks!
> 
> This is not a correct fix, and the code is still broken. However, I see
> that you have actually applied the correct v2 patch to the tree, so no big
> deal. It's probably best to reply to the correct patch confirming it's
> applied, though.
> 
> /Bruce

Yes, the right patch (v2) was applied, the wrong email was replied.
  

Patch

diff --git a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
index 77a04fe19..91011ebe8 100644
--- a/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
+++ b/examples/ip_pipeline/action.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@  port_in_action_profile_create(const char *name,
 	}
 
 	/* Node fill in */
-	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name));
+	strncpy(profile->name, name, sizeof(profile->name) - 1);
 	memcpy(&profile->params, params, sizeof(*params));
 	profile->ap = ap;