diff mbox series

net/sfc: fix double-free in EF10 ESSB Rx queue purge

Message ID 1530286866-8665-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Ferruh Yigit
Headers
Series net/sfc: fix double-free in EF10 ESSB Rx queue purge |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Andrew Rybchenko June 29, 2018, 3:41 p.m. UTC 
  Number of buffers left in completed descriptor may be 0. If so,
all buffers of the descriptor are freed once again.

Fixes: 390f9b8d82c9 ("net/sfc: support equal stride super-buffer Rx mode")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_essb_rx.c | 21 ++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Ferruh Yigit July 4, 2018, 6:13 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 6/29/2018 4:41 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> Number of buffers left in completed descriptor may be 0. If so,
> all buffers of the descriptor are freed once again.
> 
> Fixes: 390f9b8d82c9 ("net/sfc: support equal stride super-buffer Rx mode")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>

Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_essb_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_essb_rx.c
index 5f5af602c..dcb5cb24c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_essb_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_essb_rx.c
@@ -647,29 +647,20 @@  static void
 sfc_ef10_essb_rx_qpurge(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq)
 {
 	struct sfc_ef10_essb_rxq *rxq = sfc_ef10_essb_rxq_by_dp_rxq(dp_rxq);
-	unsigned int i, j;
+	unsigned int i;
 	const struct sfc_ef10_essb_rx_sw_desc *rxd;
 	struct rte_mbuf *m;
 
-	if (rxq->completed != rxq->added && rxq->left_in_completed > 0) {
-		rxd = &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->completed & rxq->rxq_ptr_mask];
-		m = sfc_ef10_essb_mbuf_by_index(rxq, rxd->first_mbuf,
-				rxq->block_size - rxq->left_in_completed);
-		do {
-			rxq->left_in_completed--;
-			rte_mempool_put(rxq->refill_mb_pool, m);
-			m = sfc_ef10_essb_next_mbuf(rxq, m);
-		} while (rxq->left_in_completed > 0);
-		rxq->completed++;
-	}
-
 	for (i = rxq->completed; i != rxq->added; ++i) {
 		rxd = &rxq->sw_ring[i & rxq->rxq_ptr_mask];
-		m = rxd->first_mbuf;
-		for (j = 0; j < rxq->block_size; ++j) {
+		m = sfc_ef10_essb_mbuf_by_index(rxq, rxd->first_mbuf,
+				rxq->block_size - rxq->left_in_completed);
+		while (rxq->left_in_completed > 0) {
 			rte_mempool_put(rxq->refill_mb_pool, m);
 			m = sfc_ef10_essb_next_mbuf(rxq, m);
+			rxq->left_in_completed--;
 		}
+		rxq->left_in_completed = rxq->block_size;
 	}
 
 	rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF10_ESSB_RXQ_STARTED;