net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and other events in 82574
Checks
Commit Message
Linux supports 82574 MSI-x interrupt for linkup and other link
conditions. Enable the same feature in the e1000 PMD in order to
allow this card to work properly, as it requires interrupt
handling for link negotiations among other things.
Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
---
Hi Wenzhuo - just to make it clear, this patch and the previous are
not targeted for 18.08, just clearing my queue.
drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c | 5 +++++
drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 19:13 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Linux supports 82574 MSI-x interrupt for linkup and other link
> conditions. Enable the same feature in the e1000 PMD in order to
> allow this card to work properly, as it requires interrupt
> handling for link negotiations among other things.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> ---
>
> Hi Wenzhuo - just to make it clear, this patch and the previous are
> not targeted for 18.08, just clearing my queue.
>
> drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Ping. Any chance this can get looked at? Thanks!
Hi, Luca Boccassi
A question for this feature, in em code, function eth_em_interrupt_handler() we have no process for handle other cause interrupt.
So, why do we enable this OTHER cause interrupt in DPDK?
You mean some application may take advance of this interrupt for some unknown purpose when using DPDK?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi
> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 2:13 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi
> <bluca@debian.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and other
> events in 82574
>
> Linux supports 82574 MSI-x interrupt for linkup and other link conditions.
> Enable the same feature in the e1000 PMD in order to allow this card to work
> properly, as it requires interrupt handling for link negotiations among other
> things.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> ---
>
> Hi Wenzhuo - just to make it clear, this patch and the previous are not
> targeted for 18.08, just clearing my queue.
>
> drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> index 7c279dbb3..397dd9482 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> @@ -1257,6 +1257,11 @@ STATIC s32 e1000_init_hw_82571(struct e1000_hw
> *hw)
> */
> e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_82571(hw);
>
> + /* MSI-X configure for 82574 */
> + if (mac->type == e1000_82574)
> + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IVAR,
> + (E1000_IVAR_INT_ALLOC_VALID << 16));
> +
> return ret_val;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c index 7039dc100..bd05e4de0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> @@ -1444,7 +1444,8 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> /* clear interrupt */
> E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
> regval = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_IMS);
> - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, regval | E1000_ICR_LSC);
> + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS,
> + regval | E1000_ICR_LSC | E1000_ICR_OTHER);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw *hw) static
> void em_lsc_intr_disable(struct e1000_hw *hw) {
> - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC);
> + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC |
> E1000_IMS_OTHER);
> E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> }
>
> --
> 2.18.0
As datasheet list:
Other Interrupt. Indicates one of the following interrupts was set:
* Link Status Change.
* Receiver Overrun.
* MDIO Access Complete.
* Small Receive Packet Detected.
* Receive ACK Frame Detected.
* Manageability Event Detected.
Which is need when using DPDK?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao1, Wei
> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 6:17 PM
> To: 'Luca Boccassi' <bluca@debian.org>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> other events in 82574
>
> Hi, Luca Boccassi
>
> A question for this feature, in em code, function
> eth_em_interrupt_handler() we have no process for handle other cause
> interrupt.
> So, why do we enable this OTHER cause interrupt in DPDK?
> You mean some application may take advance of this interrupt for some
> unknown purpose when using DPDK?
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi
> > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 2:13 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi
> > <bluca@debian.org>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> > other events in 82574
> >
> > Linux supports 82574 MSI-x interrupt for linkup and other link conditions.
> > Enable the same feature in the e1000 PMD in order to allow this card
> > to work properly, as it requires interrupt handling for link
> > negotiations among other things.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Hi Wenzhuo - just to make it clear, this patch and the previous are
> > not targeted for 18.08, just clearing my queue.
> >
> > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c | 5 +++++
> > drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > index 7c279dbb3..397dd9482 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > @@ -1257,6 +1257,11 @@ STATIC s32 e1000_init_hw_82571(struct
> e1000_hw
> > *hw)
> > */
> > e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_82571(hw);
> >
> > + /* MSI-X configure for 82574 */
> > + if (mac->type == e1000_82574)
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IVAR,
> > + (E1000_IVAR_INT_ALLOC_VALID << 16));
> > +
> > return ret_val;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c index 7039dc100..bd05e4de0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1444,7 +1444,8 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev)
> > /* clear interrupt */
> > E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
> > regval = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_IMS);
> > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, regval | E1000_ICR_LSC);
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS,
> > + regval | E1000_ICR_LSC | E1000_ICR_OTHER);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> static
> > void em_lsc_intr_disable(struct e1000_hw *hw) {
> > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC);
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC |
> > E1000_IMS_OTHER);
> > E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.18.0
On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 10:16 +0000, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> Hi, Luca Boccassi
>
> A question for this feature, in em code, function
> eth_em_interrupt_handler() we have no process for handle other cause
> interrupt.
> So, why do we enable this OTHER cause interrupt in DPDK?
> You mean some application may take advance of this interrupt for some
> unknown purpose when using DPDK?
Hi,
This MSI-x interrupt is for link state change, which is already handled
by the driver.
As mentioned, without this link state change for the 82574 NIC does not
work.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi
> > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 2:13 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi
> > <bluca@debian.org>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> > other
> > events in 82574
> >
> > Linux supports 82574 MSI-x interrupt for linkup and other link
> > conditions.
> > Enable the same feature in the e1000 PMD in order to allow this
> > card to work
> > properly, as it requires interrupt handling for link negotiations
> > among other
> > things.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Hi Wenzhuo - just to make it clear, this patch and the previous are
> > not
> > targeted for 18.08, just clearing my queue.
> >
> > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c | 5 +++++
> > drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > index 7c279dbb3..397dd9482 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > @@ -1257,6 +1257,11 @@ STATIC s32 e1000_init_hw_82571(struct
> > e1000_hw
> > *hw)
> > */
> > e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_82571(hw);
> >
> > + /* MSI-X configure for 82574 */
> > + if (mac->type == e1000_82574)
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IVAR,
> > + (E1000_IVAR_INT_ALLOC_VALID <<
> > 16));
> > +
> > return ret_val;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c index 7039dc100..bd05e4de0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1444,7 +1444,8 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> > *dev)
> > /* clear interrupt */
> > E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
> > regval = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_IMS);
> > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, regval | E1000_ICR_LSC);
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS,
> > + regval | E1000_ICR_LSC | E1000_ICR_OTHER);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw
> > *hw) static
> > void em_lsc_intr_disable(struct e1000_hw *hw) {
> > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC);
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC |
> > E1000_IMS_OTHER);
> > E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.18.0
>
>
Acked-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:bluca@debian.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 6:33 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> other events in 82574
>
> On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 10:16 +0000, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> > Hi, Luca Boccassi
> >
> > A question for this feature, in em code, function
> > eth_em_interrupt_handler() we have no process for handle other cause
> > interrupt.
> > So, why do we enable this OTHER cause interrupt in DPDK?
> > You mean some application may take advance of this interrupt for some
> > unknown purpose when using DPDK?
>
> Hi,
>
> This MSI-x interrupt is for link state change, which is already handled by the
> driver.
> As mentioned, without this link state change for the 82574 NIC does not work.
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 2:13 AM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi
> > > <bluca@debian.org>
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> > > other events in 82574
> > >
> > > Linux supports 82574 MSI-x interrupt for linkup and other link
> > > conditions.
> > > Enable the same feature in the e1000 PMD in order to allow this card
> > > to work properly, as it requires interrupt handling for link
> > > negotiations among other things.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Hi Wenzhuo - just to make it clear, this patch and the previous are
> > > not targeted for 18.08, just clearing my queue.
> > >
> > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c | 5 +++++
> > > drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > > b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > > index 7c279dbb3..397dd9482 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > > @@ -1257,6 +1257,11 @@ STATIC s32 e1000_init_hw_82571(struct
> > > e1000_hw
> > > *hw)
> > > */
> > > e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_82571(hw);
> > >
> > > + /* MSI-X configure for 82574 */
> > > + if (mac->type == e1000_82574)
> > > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IVAR,
> > > + (E1000_IVAR_INT_ALLOC_VALID <<
> > > 16));
> > > +
> > > return ret_val;
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > > b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c index 7039dc100..bd05e4de0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -1444,7 +1444,8 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > *dev)
> > > /* clear interrupt */
> > > E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
> > > regval = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_IMS);
> > > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, regval | E1000_ICR_LSC);
> > > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS,
> > > + regval | E1000_ICR_LSC | E1000_ICR_OTHER);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw
> > > *hw) static
> > > void em_lsc_intr_disable(struct e1000_hw *hw) {
> > > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC);
> > > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC |
> > > E1000_IMS_OTHER);
> > > E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.18.0
> >
> >
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Luca Boccassi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao1, Wei
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 12:14 AM
> To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> other events in 82574
>
> Acked-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
Thanks
Qi
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:bluca@debian.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 6:33 PM
> > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> > <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> > other events in 82574
> >
> > On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 10:16 +0000, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> > > Hi, Luca Boccassi
> > >
> > > A question for this feature, in em code, function
> > > eth_em_interrupt_handler() we have no process for handle other cause
> > > interrupt.
> > > So, why do we enable this OTHER cause interrupt in DPDK?
> > > You mean some application may take advance of this interrupt for
> > > some unknown purpose when using DPDK?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This MSI-x interrupt is for link state change, which is already
> > handled by the driver.
> > As mentioned, without this link state change for the 82574 NIC does not
> work.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi
> > > > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 2:13 AM
> > > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi
> > > > <bluca@debian.org>
> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> > > > other events in 82574
> > > >
> > > > Linux supports 82574 MSI-x interrupt for linkup and other link
> > > > conditions.
> > > > Enable the same feature in the e1000 PMD in order to allow this
> > > > card to work properly, as it requires interrupt handling for link
> > > > negotiations among other things.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Hi Wenzhuo - just to make it clear, this patch and the previous
> > > > are not targeted for 18.08, just clearing my queue.
> > > >
> > > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c | 5 +++++
> > > > drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > > > index 7c279dbb3..397dd9482 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > > > @@ -1257,6 +1257,11 @@ STATIC s32 e1000_init_hw_82571(struct
> > > > e1000_hw
> > > > *hw)
> > > > */
> > > > e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_82571(hw);
> > > >
> > > > + /* MSI-X configure for 82574 */
> > > > + if (mac->type == e1000_82574)
> > > > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IVAR,
> > > > + (E1000_IVAR_INT_ALLOC_VALID <<
> > > > 16));
> > > > +
> > > > return ret_val;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c index 7039dc100..bd05e4de0
> 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > > > @@ -1444,7 +1444,8 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > > *dev)
> > > > /* clear interrupt */
> > > > E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
> > > > regval = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_IMS);
> > > > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, regval | E1000_ICR_LSC);
> > > > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS,
> > > > + regval | E1000_ICR_LSC | E1000_ICR_OTHER);
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw
> > > > *hw) static
> > > > void em_lsc_intr_disable(struct e1000_hw *hw) {
> > > > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC);
> > > > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC |
> > > > E1000_IMS_OTHER);
> > > > E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.18.0
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> > Luca Boccassi
@@ -1257,6 +1257,11 @@ STATIC s32 e1000_init_hw_82571(struct e1000_hw *hw)
*/
e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_82571(hw);
+ /* MSI-X configure for 82574 */
+ if (mac->type == e1000_82574)
+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IVAR,
+ (E1000_IVAR_INT_ALLOC_VALID << 16));
+
return ret_val;
}
@@ -1444,7 +1444,8 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
/* clear interrupt */
E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
regval = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_IMS);
- E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, regval | E1000_ICR_LSC);
+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS,
+ regval | E1000_ICR_LSC | E1000_ICR_OTHER);
return 0;
}
@@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw *hw)
static void
em_lsc_intr_disable(struct e1000_hw *hw)
{
- E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC);
+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC | E1000_IMS_OTHER);
E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
}