[1/2] net/sfc: fix an Rx queue double release possibility

Message ID 1536910296-17455-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Ferruh Yigit
Headers
Series [1/2] net/sfc: fix an Rx queue double release possibility |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Andrew Rybchenko Sept. 14, 2018, 7:31 a.m. UTC
  From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>

There are two function that call sfc_rx_qfini():
sfc_rx_fini_queues() and sfc_rx_queue_release(). But only
sfc_rx_queue_release() sets rx_queues pointer of the device data to NULL.
It may lead to the scenario in which a queue is destroyed by
sfc_rx_fini_queues() and after the queue is attempted to be destroyed again
by sfc_rx_queue_release().

Move NULL assignment to sfc_rx_qfini().

Fixes: ce35b05c635e ("net/sfc: implement Rx queue setup release operations")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c | 2 --
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c     | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Ferruh Yigit Sept. 21, 2018, 2:53 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9/14/2018 8:31 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
> 
> There are two function that call sfc_rx_qfini():
> sfc_rx_fini_queues() and sfc_rx_queue_release(). But only
> sfc_rx_queue_release() sets rx_queues pointer of the device data to NULL.
> It may lead to the scenario in which a queue is destroyed by
> sfc_rx_fini_queues() and after the queue is attempted to be destroyed again
> by sfc_rx_queue_release().
> 
> Move NULL assignment to sfc_rx_qfini().
> 
> Fixes: ce35b05c635e ("net/sfc: implement Rx queue setup release operations")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>

Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
index 435bde67f..23778c9f3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
@@ -444,8 +444,6 @@  sfc_rx_queue_release(void *queue)
 
 	sfc_log_init(sa, "RxQ=%u", sw_index);
 
-	sa->eth_dev->data->rx_queues[sw_index] = NULL;
-
 	sfc_rx_qfini(sa, sw_index);
 
 	sfc_adapter_unlock(sa);
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
index c6321d174..5bd6bb9be 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
@@ -1104,6 +1104,7 @@  sfc_rx_qfini(struct sfc_adapter *sa, unsigned int sw_index)
 	struct sfc_rxq *rxq;
 
 	SFC_ASSERT(sw_index < sa->rxq_count);
+	sa->eth_dev->data->rx_queues[sw_index] = NULL;
 
 	rxq_info = &sa->rxq_info[sw_index];