[4/4] net/mlx5: add E-switch rule hardware offload flag check
Checks
Commit Message
This patch adds the in_hw flag check for tc flower filter rules.
If rule is applied without skip_sw flag set driver should check
whether the in_hw flag is set after rule applying. If no in_hw
flag set found it means the rule is not hardware offloaded and
error should be returned to application.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 142 insertions(+)
@@ -5082,6 +5082,134 @@ struct tcf_nlcb_context {
pthread_mutex_unlock(&vtep_list_mutex);
}
+struct tcf_nlcb_query {
+ uint32_t handle;
+ uint32_t tc_flags;
+ uint32_t flags_valid:1;
+};
+
+/**
+ * Collect queried rule attributes. This is callback routine called by
+ * libmnl mnl_cb_run() in loop for every message in received packet.
+ * Current implementation collects the flower flags only.
+ *
+ * @param[in] nlh
+ * Pointer to reply header.
+ * @param[in, out] arg
+ * Context pointer for this callback.
+ *
+ * @return
+ * A positive, nonzero value on success (required by libmnl
+ * to continue messages processing).
+ */
+static int
+flow_tcf_collect_query_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
+{
+ struct tcf_nlcb_query *query = arg;
+ struct tcmsg *tcm = mnl_nlmsg_get_payload(nlh);
+ struct nlattr *na, *na_opt;
+ bool flower = false;
+
+ if (nlh->nlmsg_type != RTM_NEWTFILTER ||
+ tcm->tcm_handle != query->handle)
+ return 1;
+ mnl_attr_for_each(na, nlh, sizeof(*tcm)) {
+ switch (mnl_attr_get_type(na)) {
+ case TCA_KIND:
+ if (strcmp(mnl_attr_get_payload(na), "flower")) {
+ /* Not flower filter, drop entire message. */
+ return 1;
+ }
+ flower = true;
+ break;
+ case TCA_OPTIONS:
+ if (!flower) {
+ /* Not flower options, drop entire message. */
+ return 1;
+ }
+ /* Check nested flower options. */
+ mnl_attr_for_each_nested(na_opt, na) {
+ switch (mnl_attr_get_type(na_opt)) {
+ case TCA_FLOWER_FLAGS:
+ query->flags_valid = 1;
+ query->tc_flags =
+ mnl_attr_get_u32(na_opt);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Query a TC flower rule flags via netlink.
+ *
+ * @param[in] tcf
+ * Context object initialized by mlx5_flow_tcf_context_create().
+ * @param[in] dev_flow
+ * Pointer to the flow.
+ * @param[out] pflags
+ * pointer to the data retrieved by the query.
+ *
+ * @return
+ * 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise.
+ */
+static int
+flow_tcf_query_flags(struct mlx5_flow_tcf_context *tcf,
+ struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
+ uint32_t *pflags)
+{
+ struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
+ struct tcmsg *tcm;
+ struct tcf_nlcb_query query = {
+ .handle = dev_flow->tcf.tcm->tcm_handle,
+ };
+
+ nlh = mnl_nlmsg_put_header(tcf->buf);
+ nlh->nlmsg_type = RTM_GETTFILTER;
+ nlh->nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST;
+ tcm = mnl_nlmsg_put_extra_header(nlh, sizeof(*tcm));
+ memcpy(tcm, dev_flow->tcf.tcm, sizeof(*tcm));
+ /*
+ * Ignore Netlink error for filter query operations.
+ * The reply length is sent by kernel as errno.
+ * Just check we got the flags option.
+ */
+ flow_tcf_nl_ack(tcf, nlh, flow_tcf_collect_query_cb, &query);
+ if (!query.flags_valid) {
+ *pflags = 0;
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
+ *pflags = query.tc_flags;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Query and check the in_hw set for specified rule.
+ *
+ * @param[in] tcf
+ * Context object initialized by mlx5_flow_tcf_context_create().
+ * @param[in] dev_flow
+ * Pointer to the flow to check.
+ *
+ * @return
+ * 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise.
+ */
+static int
+flow_tcf_check_inhw(struct mlx5_flow_tcf_context *tcf,
+ struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow)
+{
+ uint32_t flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = flow_tcf_query_flags(tcf, dev_flow, &flags);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ return (flags & TCA_CLS_FLAGS_IN_HW) ? 0 : -ENOENT;
+}
+
/**
* Remove flow from E-Switch by sending Netlink message.
*
@@ -5173,6 +5301,20 @@ struct tcf_nlcb_context {
}
if (!flow_tcf_nl_ack(ctx, nlh, NULL, NULL)) {
dev_flow->tcf.applied = 1;
+ if (*dev_flow->tcf.ptc_flags & TCA_CLS_FLAGS_SKIP_SW)
+ return 0;
+ /*
+ * Rule was applied without skip_sw flag set.
+ * We should check whether the rule was acctually
+ * accepted by hardware (have look at in_hw flag).
+ */
+ if (flow_tcf_check_inhw(ctx, dev_flow)) {
+ flow_tcf_remove(dev, flow);
+ return rte_flow_error_set
+ (error, ENOENT,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
+ "netlink: rule has no in_hw flag set");
+ }
return 0;
}
if (dev_flow->tcf.tunnel) {