[v2] test/hash: reset iter and found in perf test

Message ID 20190114092304.1195-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Ferruh Yigit
Headers
Series [v2] test/hash: reset iter and found in perf test |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/mellanox-Performance-Testing success Performance Testing PASS
ci/intel-Performance-Testing success Performance Testing PASS

Commit Message

Dharmik Thakkar Jan. 14, 2019, 9:23 a.m. UTC
  Reset 'iter' and 'tbl_rw_test_param.found' on each iteration
to give correct result for lost and duplicated keys.

This patch also changes the default return value of the test to -1
when not enough resources are provided.

Fixes: 0eb3726ebcf14 ("test/hash: add test for read/write concurrency")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>
--
v2:
* Update commit message
* Change 'found' array type to uint8_t
* Restore declaration of 'iter' to the start
---
 test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Thomas Monjalon Jan. 14, 2019, 11:19 p.m. UTC | #1
14/01/2019 10:23, Dharmik Thakkar:
> Reset 'iter' and 'tbl_rw_test_param.found' on each iteration
> to give correct result for lost and duplicated keys.
> 
> This patch also changes the default return value of the test to -1
> when not enough resources are provided.
> 
> Fixes: 0eb3726ebcf14 ("test/hash: add test for read/write concurrency")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>

Applied, thanks
  

Patch

diff --git a/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c b/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
index 6b695ce6e444..480ae97d857d 100644
--- a/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
+++ b/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@  static struct perf htm_results, non_htm_results;
 
 struct {
 	uint32_t *keys;
-	uint32_t *found;
+	uint8_t *found;
 	uint32_t num_insert;
 	uint32_t rounded_tot_insert;
 	struct rte_hash *h;
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@  init_params(int use_ext, int use_htm, int use_jhash)
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	uint32_t *keys = NULL;
-	uint32_t *found = NULL;
+	uint8_t *found = NULL;
 	struct rte_hash *handle;
 
 	struct rte_hash_parameters hash_params = {
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@  init_params(int use_ext, int use_htm, int use_jhash)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	found = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_ENTRY, 0);
+	found = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint8_t) * TOTAL_ENTRY, 0);
 	if (found == NULL) {
 		printf("RTE_ZMALLOC failed\n");
 		goto err;
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@  test_hash_readwrite_perf(struct perf *perf_results, int use_htm,
 
 	const void *next_key;
 	void *next_data;
-	uint32_t iter = 0;
+	uint32_t iter;
 	int use_jhash = 0;
 
 	uint32_t duplicated_keys = 0;
@@ -536,6 +536,8 @@  test_hash_readwrite_perf(struct perf *perf_results, int use_htm,
 
 		rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
 
+		iter = 0;
+		memset(tbl_rw_test_param.found, 0, TOTAL_ENTRY);
 		while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rw_test_param.h,
 				&next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) {
 			/* Search for the key in the list of keys added .*/
@@ -619,7 +621,7 @@  test_hash_readwrite_main(void)
 	if (rte_lcore_count() <= 2) {
 		printf("More than two lcores are required "
 			"to do read write test\n");
-		return 0;
+		return -1;
 	}
 
 	RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(core_id) {