[v4] test/rcu: fix build for small number of cores
Checks
Commit Message
If the RTE_MAX_LCORE is less than 10, a compilation error is generated:
app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c:234:10: error: comparison of integer
expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’
[-Werror=sign-compare]
The cause is (RTE_MAX_LCORE - 10) results in a negative value.
To fix, use rte_rand() to find a number between 0 and RTE_MAX_LCORE.
Fixes: b87089b0bb19 ("test/rcu: add API and functional tests")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
---
v4:
- separate from the N1SDP configuration patch series
- fix the build for smaller number of cores(Thomas Monjalon)
---
app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
25/11/2019 04:36, Gavin Hu:
> If the RTE_MAX_LCORE is less than 10, a compilation error is generated:
> app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c:234:10: error: comparison of integer
> expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’
> [-Werror=sign-compare]
>
> The cause is (RTE_MAX_LCORE - 10) results in a negative value.
>
> To fix, use rte_rand() to find a number between 0 and RTE_MAX_LCORE.
>
> Fixes: b87089b0bb19 ("test/rcu: add API and functional tests")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Applied, thanks
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <rte_hash_crc.h>
#include <rte_malloc.h>
#include <rte_cycles.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "test.h"
@@ -168,6 +169,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(void)
{
unsigned int num_threads[3] = {1, RTE_MAX_LCORE, 1};
unsigned int i, j;
+ unsigned int skip_thread_id;
uint64_t token;
int ret;
@@ -227,10 +229,11 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(void)
token = rte_rcu_qsbr_start(t[0]);
TEST_RCU_QSBR_RETURN_IF_ERROR(
(token != (TEST_RCU_QSBR_CNT_INIT + 1)), "QSBR Start");
+ skip_thread_id = rte_rand() % RTE_MAX_LCORE;
/* Update quiescent state counter */
for (i = 0; i < num_threads[j]; i++) {
/* Skip one update */
- if (i == (RTE_MAX_LCORE - 10))
+ if ((j == 1) && (i == skip_thread_id))
continue;
rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(t[0],
(j == 2) ? (RTE_MAX_LCORE - 1) : i);
@@ -242,7 +245,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(void)
TEST_RCU_QSBR_RETURN_IF_ERROR((ret == 0),
"Non-blocking QSBR check");
/* Update the previously skipped thread */
- rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(t[0], RTE_MAX_LCORE - 10);
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(t[0], skip_thread_id);
}
/* Validate the updates */