maintainers: remove QoS and pipeline repositories

Message ID 20200812090723.2206772-1-thomas@monjalon.net (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Headers
Series maintainers: remove QoS and pipeline repositories |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Thomas Monjalon Aug. 12, 2020, 9:07 a.m. UTC
  The git trees dpdk-next-qos and dpdk-next-pipeline were created
to share the load of patches merging.
It has been decided in the Technical Board that the load is not big
enough to justify keeping these repositories.

The patches for ethdev TM and MTR will be managed in dpdk-next-net.
The sched and meter libraries will be managed in the main tree.
The packet framework will be managed in the main tree as well.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 15 ++-------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Bruce Richardson Aug. 12, 2020, 12:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:07:23AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The git trees dpdk-next-qos and dpdk-next-pipeline were created
> to share the load of patches merging.
> It has been decided in the Technical Board that the load is not big
> enough to justify keeping these repositories.
> 
> The patches for ethdev TM and MTR will be managed in dpdk-next-net.
> The sched and meter libraries will be managed in the main tree.
> The packet framework will be managed in the main tree as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 15 ++-------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
  
Thomas Monjalon Aug. 12, 2020, 1:25 p.m. UTC | #2
12/08/2020 14:36, Bruce Richardson:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:07:23AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The git trees dpdk-next-qos and dpdk-next-pipeline were created
> > to share the load of patches merging.
> > It has been decided in the Technical Board that the load is not big
> > enough to justify keeping these repositories.
> > 
> > The patches for ethdev TM and MTR will be managed in dpdk-next-net.
> > The sched and meter libraries will be managed in the main tree.
> > The packet framework will be managed in the main tree as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> 
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Applied, quickly to avoid breaking CI when guessing git tree.
  
Cristian Dumitrescu Aug. 12, 2020, 3:49 p.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 2:25 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> arybchenko@solarflare.com; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>;
> Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: remove QoS and pipeline
> repositories
> 
> 12/08/2020 14:36, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:07:23AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > The git trees dpdk-next-qos and dpdk-next-pipeline were created
> > > to share the load of patches merging.
> > > It has been decided in the Technical Board that the load is not big
> > > enough to justify keeping these repositories.
> > >
> > > The patches for ethdev TM and MTR will be managed in dpdk-next-net.
> > > The sched and meter libraries will be managed in the main tree.
> > > The packet framework will be managed in the main tree as well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> >
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> Applied, quickly to avoid breaking CI when guessing git tree.
> 
> 
 I am in vacation reading emails every now and then, just saw this.

I am fine with it, as the only purpose of these trees was to sync-up on large pull requests, which was an infrequent event for these trees.

Thomas, thanks for handling this.

Regards,
Cristian
  

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 3003852b5b..ed163f5d59 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -61,14 +61,6 @@  Next-eventdev Tree
 M: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
 T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-eventdev
 
-Next-qos Tree
-M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
-T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-qos
-
-Next-pipeline Tree
-M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
-T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-pipeline
-
 Stable Branches
 M: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
 M: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
@@ -408,12 +400,12 @@  F: lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow*
 
 Traffic Management API - EXPERIMENTAL
 M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
-T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-qos
+T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net
 F: lib/librte_ethdev/rte_tm*
 
 Traffic Metering and Policing API - EXPERIMENTAL
 M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
-T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-qos
+T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net
 F: lib/librte_ethdev/rte_mtr*
 
 Baseband API - EXPERIMENTAL
@@ -1331,7 +1323,6 @@  F: doc/guides/sample_app_ug/packet_ordering.rst
 Hierarchical scheduler
 M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
 M: Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
-T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-qos
 F: lib/librte_sched/
 F: doc/guides/prog_guide/qos_framework.rst
 F: app/test/test_red.c
@@ -1351,7 +1342,6 @@  F: doc/guides/tools/pdump.rst
 Packet Framework
 ----------------
 M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
-T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-pipeline
 F: lib/librte_pipeline/
 F: lib/librte_port/
 F: lib/librte_table/
@@ -1419,7 +1409,6 @@  F: app/test-fib/
 
 Traffic metering
 M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
-T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-qos
 F: lib/librte_meter/
 F: doc/guides/sample_app_ug/qos_scheduler.rst
 F: app/test/test_meter.c