[v5] pci/linux: copy new id for inserted device

Message ID 20201013170316.37863-1-james.r.harris@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Thomas Monjalon
Headers
Series [v5] pci/linux: copy new id for inserted device |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/travis-robot warning Travis build: failed
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Harris, James R Oct. 13, 2020, 5:03 p.m. UTC
  When a device is inserted into an existing BDF slot
that has not been probed, we must overwrite the old
PCI ID with the ID of the new function. Otherwise
we may not probe the function with the correct driver,
if at all.

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
---
 drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Thomas Monjalon Oct. 13, 2020, 9:02 p.m. UTC | #1
13/10/2020 19:03, Jim Harris:
> When a device is inserted into an existing BDF slot
> that has not been probed, we must overwrite the old
> PCI ID with the ID of the new function. Otherwise
> we may not probe the function with the correct driver,
> if at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>

Applied, thanks
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c
index a2198abf4..e51f9d756 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c
@@ -352,6 +352,7 @@  pci_scan_one(const char *dirname, const struct rte_pci_addr *addr)
 				if (!rte_dev_is_probed(&dev2->device)) {
 					dev2->kdrv = dev->kdrv;
 					dev2->max_vfs = dev->max_vfs;
+					dev2->id = dev->id;
 					pci_name_set(dev2);
 					memmove(dev2->mem_resource,
 						dev->mem_resource,
@@ -365,7 +366,8 @@  pci_scan_one(const char *dirname, const struct rte_pci_addr *addr)
 					 * need to do anything here unless...
 					 **/
 					if (dev2->kdrv != dev->kdrv ||
-						dev2->max_vfs != dev->max_vfs)
+						dev2->max_vfs != dev->max_vfs ||
+						memcmp(&dev2->id, &dev->id, sizeof(dev2->id)))
 						/*
 						 * This should not happens.
 						 * But it is still possible if