[v2,3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking in rcu qsbr perf

Message ID 20201102235203.6342-4-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: David Marchand
Headers
Series test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Dharmik Thakkar Nov. 2, 2020, 11:52 p.m. UTC
  Remove redundant error checking for reader threads
since they never return error.

Fixes: eff30b59cc2e ("test/lpm: add RCU performance tests")
Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Honnappa Nagarahalli Nov. 3, 2020, 1:21 a.m. UTC | #1
<snip>

> 
> Remove redundant error checking for reader threads since they never return
> error.
> 
> Fixes: eff30b59cc2e ("test/lpm: add RCU performance tests")
> Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c index
> 55084816ab91..224c92fa3d65 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> @@ -554,11 +554,10 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>  		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
>  		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
> 
> -	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
>  	writer_done = 1;
> +	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>  	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
> -			goto error;
> +		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
> 
>  	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>  	rte_free(rv);
> @@ -603,10 +602,9 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>  		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
> 
>  	writer_done = 1;
> -	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
> +	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>  	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
> -			goto error;
> +		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
> 
>  	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> 
> @@ -710,10 +708,9 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
>  		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
> 
>  	writer_done = 1;
> -	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
> +	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
> -			goto error;
> +		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
                             ^^ Do we need the 'if' statement?
> 
>  	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>  	rte_free(rv);
> @@ -769,11 +766,9 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
>  		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
> 
>  	writer_done = 1;
> -	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
> +	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
> -			printf("Warning: lcore %u not finished.\n",
> -				enabled_core_ids[i]);
> +		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
> 
>  	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> 
> --
> 2.17.1
  
Dharmik Thakkar Nov. 3, 2020, 4:56 a.m. UTC | #2
> On Nov 2, 2020, at 7:21 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> 
>> Remove redundant error checking for reader threads since they never return
>> error.
>> 
>> Fixes: eff30b59cc2e ("test/lpm: add RCU performance tests")
>> Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
>> ---
>> app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c index
>> 55084816ab91..224c92fa3d65 100644
>> --- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
>> +++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
>> @@ -554,11 +554,10 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>> 		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
>> 		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
>> 
>> -	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
>> 	writer_done = 1;
>> +	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> 	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>> -			goto error;
>> +		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> 
>> 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> 	rte_free(rv);
>> @@ -603,10 +602,9 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>> 		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
>> 
>> 	writer_done = 1;
>> -	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
>> +	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> 	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>> -			goto error;
>> +		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> 
>> 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> 
>> @@ -710,10 +708,9 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
>> 		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
>> 
>> 	writer_done = 1;
>> -	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
>> +	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> 	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>> -			goto error;
>> +		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>                             ^^ Do we need the 'if' statement?

No, will remove in the next version.

>> 
>> 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> 	rte_free(rv);
>> @@ -769,11 +766,9 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
>> 		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
>> 
>> 	writer_done = 1;
>> -	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
>> +	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> 	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>> -			printf("Warning: lcore %u not finished.\n",
>> -				enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> +		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> 
>> 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> 
>> --
>> 2.17.1
  

Patch

diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
index 55084816ab91..224c92fa3d65 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
@@ -554,11 +554,10 @@  test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
 		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
 		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
 
-	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
 	writer_done = 1;
+	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
 	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
-		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
-			goto error;
+		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
 
 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
 	rte_free(rv);
@@ -603,10 +602,9 @@  test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
 		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
 
 	writer_done = 1;
-	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
+	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
 	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
-		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
-			goto error;
+		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
 
 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
 
@@ -710,10 +708,9 @@  test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
 		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
 
 	writer_done = 1;
-	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
+	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
 	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
-		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
-			goto error;
+		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
 
 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
 	rte_free(rv);
@@ -769,11 +766,9 @@  test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
 		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
 
 	writer_done = 1;
-	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
+	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
 	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
-		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
-			printf("Warning: lcore %u not finished.\n",
-				enabled_core_ids[i]);
+		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
 
 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);