examples/vhost: add error propagation in ioat ops

Message ID 20210131123628.47883-1-Cheng1.jiang@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Maxime Coquelin
Headers
Series examples/vhost: add error propagation in ioat ops |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-testing fail Testing issues

Commit Message

Jiang, Cheng1 Jan. 31, 2021, 12:36 p.m. UTC
  It makes more sense to add error propagation for rte_ioat_completed_ops.

Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <Cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
---
 examples/vhost/ioat.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Maxime Coquelin Feb. 3, 2021, 9:48 a.m. UTC | #1
On 1/31/21 1:36 PM, Cheng Jiang wrote:
> It makes more sense to add error propagation for rte_ioat_completed_ops.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <Cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
>  examples/vhost/ioat.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/vhost/ioat.c b/examples/vhost/ioat.c
> index dbad28d43..60b73be93 100644
> --- a/examples/vhost/ioat.c
> +++ b/examples/vhost/ioat.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ struct packet_tracker {
>  
>  struct packet_tracker cb_tracker[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
>  
> -
>  int
>  open_ioat(const char *value)
>  {
> @@ -129,7 +128,7 @@ ioat_transfer_data_cb(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>  		struct rte_vhost_async_status *opaque_data, uint16_t count)
>  {
>  	uint32_t i_desc;
> -	int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 + VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
> +	uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 + VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;

This change from uint16_t to int does not seem related to the purpose of
this patch. Is it?

>  	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *src = NULL;
>  	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *dst = NULL;
>  	unsigned long i_seg;
> @@ -182,10 +181,17 @@ ioat_check_completed_copies_cb(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>  		unsigned short mask = MAX_ENQUEUED_SIZE - 1;
>  		unsigned short i;
>  
> -		int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
> +		uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
>  				+ VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
>  		n_seg = rte_ioat_completed_ops(dev_id, 255, dump, dump);
> -		if (n_seg <= 0)
> +		if (n_seg < 0) {
> +			RTE_LOG(ERR,
> +				VHOST_DATA,
> +				"fail to poll completed buf on IOAT device %u",
> +				dev_id);
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		if (n_seg == 0)
>  			return 0;
>  
>  		cb_tracker[dev_id].ioat_space += n_seg;
>
  
Jiang, Cheng1 Feb. 3, 2021, 11:52 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 5:49 PM
> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo
> <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Yang, YvonneX
> <yvonnex.yang@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples/vhost: add error propagation in ioat ops
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/31/21 1:36 PM, Cheng Jiang wrote:
> > It makes more sense to add error propagation for rte_ioat_completed_ops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <Cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  examples/vhost/ioat.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/examples/vhost/ioat.c b/examples/vhost/ioat.c index
> > dbad28d43..60b73be93 100644
> > --- a/examples/vhost/ioat.c
> > +++ b/examples/vhost/ioat.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ struct packet_tracker {
> >
> >  struct packet_tracker cb_tracker[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
> >
> > -
> >  int
> >  open_ioat(const char *value)
> >  {
> > @@ -129,7 +128,7 @@ ioat_transfer_data_cb(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
> >  		struct rte_vhost_async_status *opaque_data, uint16_t count)
> {
> >  	uint32_t i_desc;
> > -	int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 +
> VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
> > +	uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 +
> > +VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
> 
> This change from uint16_t to int does not seem related to the purpose of this
> patch. Is it?

Yes, this change has nothing to do with adding the log, I just noticed uint16_t is more appropriate and changed here.
I can only add the log if you think change the type of dev_id here is not ok.

Thanks.
Cheng

> 
> >  	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *src = NULL;
> >  	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *dst = NULL;
> >  	unsigned long i_seg;
> > @@ -182,10 +181,17 @@ ioat_check_completed_copies_cb(int vid,
> uint16_t queue_id,
> >  		unsigned short mask = MAX_ENQUEUED_SIZE - 1;
> >  		unsigned short i;
> >
> > -		int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
> > +		uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
> >  				+ VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
> >  		n_seg = rte_ioat_completed_ops(dev_id, 255, dump, dump);
> > -		if (n_seg <= 0)
> > +		if (n_seg < 0) {
> > +			RTE_LOG(ERR,
> > +				VHOST_DATA,
> > +				"fail to poll completed buf on IOAT
> device %u",
> > +				dev_id);
> > +			return 0;
> > +		}
> > +		if (n_seg == 0)
> >  			return 0;
> >
> >  		cb_tracker[dev_id].ioat_space += n_seg;
> >
  
Maxime Coquelin Feb. 3, 2021, 12:48 p.m. UTC | #3
On 2/3/21 12:52 PM, Jiang, Cheng1 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 5:49 PM
>> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo
>> <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Yang, YvonneX
>> <yvonnex.yang@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples/vhost: add error propagation in ioat ops
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/31/21 1:36 PM, Cheng Jiang wrote:
>>> It makes more sense to add error propagation for rte_ioat_completed_ops.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <Cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  examples/vhost/ioat.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/examples/vhost/ioat.c b/examples/vhost/ioat.c index
>>> dbad28d43..60b73be93 100644
>>> --- a/examples/vhost/ioat.c
>>> +++ b/examples/vhost/ioat.c
>>> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ struct packet_tracker {
>>>
>>>  struct packet_tracker cb_tracker[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
>>>
>>> -
>>>  int
>>>  open_ioat(const char *value)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -129,7 +128,7 @@ ioat_transfer_data_cb(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>>>  		struct rte_vhost_async_status *opaque_data, uint16_t count)
>> {
>>>  	uint32_t i_desc;
>>> -	int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 +
>> VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
>>> +	uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 +
>>> +VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
>>
>> This change from uint16_t to int does not seem related to the purpose of this
>> patch. Is it?
> 
> Yes, this change has nothing to do with adding the log, I just noticed uint16_t is more appropriate and changed here.
> I can only add the log if you think change the type of dev_id here is not ok.

Better to have two commits since these are two different changes.
At least please mention it in the commit message.

Thanks,
Maxime


> Thanks.
> Cheng
> 
>>
>>>  	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *src = NULL;
>>>  	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *dst = NULL;
>>>  	unsigned long i_seg;
>>> @@ -182,10 +181,17 @@ ioat_check_completed_copies_cb(int vid,
>> uint16_t queue_id,
>>>  		unsigned short mask = MAX_ENQUEUED_SIZE - 1;
>>>  		unsigned short i;
>>>
>>> -		int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
>>> +		uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
>>>  				+ VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
>>>  		n_seg = rte_ioat_completed_ops(dev_id, 255, dump, dump);
>>> -		if (n_seg <= 0)
>>> +		if (n_seg < 0) {
>>> +			RTE_LOG(ERR,
>>> +				VHOST_DATA,
>>> +				"fail to poll completed buf on IOAT
>> device %u",
>>> +				dev_id);
>>> +			return 0;
>>> +		}
>>> +		if (n_seg == 0)
>>>  			return 0;
>>>
>>>  		cb_tracker[dev_id].ioat_space += n_seg;
>>>
>
  
Jiang, Cheng1 Feb. 3, 2021, 1:10 p.m. UTC | #4
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:49 PM
> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo
> <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Yang, YvonneX
> <yvonnex.yang@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples/vhost: add error propagation in ioat ops
> 
> 
> 
> On 2/3/21 12:52 PM, Jiang, Cheng1 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 5:49 PM
> >> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo
> >> <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Yang, YvonneX
> >> <yvonnex.yang@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples/vhost: add error propagation in ioat
> >> ops
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/31/21 1:36 PM, Cheng Jiang wrote:
> >>> It makes more sense to add error propagation for
> rte_ioat_completed_ops.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <Cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  examples/vhost/ioat.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> >>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/examples/vhost/ioat.c b/examples/vhost/ioat.c index
> >>> dbad28d43..60b73be93 100644
> >>> --- a/examples/vhost/ioat.c
> >>> +++ b/examples/vhost/ioat.c
> >>> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ struct packet_tracker {
> >>>
> >>>  struct packet_tracker cb_tracker[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>>  int
> >>>  open_ioat(const char *value)
> >>>  {
> >>> @@ -129,7 +128,7 @@ ioat_transfer_data_cb(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
> >>>  		struct rte_vhost_async_status *opaque_data, uint16_t count)
> >> {
> >>>  	uint32_t i_desc;
> >>> -	int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 +
> >> VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
> >>> +	uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 +
> >>> +VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
> >>
> >> This change from uint16_t to int does not seem related to the purpose
> >> of this patch. Is it?
> >
> > Yes, this change has nothing to do with adding the log, I just noticed
> uint16_t is more appropriate and changed here.
> > I can only add the log if you think change the type of dev_id here is not ok.
> 
> Better to have two commits since these are two different changes.
> At least please mention it in the commit message.

Sure, I'll mention it in the commit message.

Thanks,
Cheng

> 
> Thanks,
> Maxime
> 
> 
> > Thanks.
> > Cheng
> >
> >>
> >>>  	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *src = NULL;
> >>>  	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *dst = NULL;
> >>>  	unsigned long i_seg;
> >>> @@ -182,10 +181,17 @@ ioat_check_completed_copies_cb(int vid,
> >> uint16_t queue_id,
> >>>  		unsigned short mask = MAX_ENQUEUED_SIZE - 1;
> >>>  		unsigned short i;
> >>>
> >>> -		int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
> >>> +		uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
> >>>  				+ VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
> >>>  		n_seg = rte_ioat_completed_ops(dev_id, 255, dump, dump);
> >>> -		if (n_seg <= 0)
> >>> +		if (n_seg < 0) {
> >>> +			RTE_LOG(ERR,
> >>> +				VHOST_DATA,
> >>> +				"fail to poll completed buf on IOAT
> >> device %u",
> >>> +				dev_id);
> >>> +			return 0;
> >>> +		}
> >>> +		if (n_seg == 0)
> >>>  			return 0;
> >>>
> >>>  		cb_tracker[dev_id].ioat_space += n_seg;
> >>>
> >
  

Patch

diff --git a/examples/vhost/ioat.c b/examples/vhost/ioat.c
index dbad28d43..60b73be93 100644
--- a/examples/vhost/ioat.c
+++ b/examples/vhost/ioat.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@  struct packet_tracker {
 
 struct packet_tracker cb_tracker[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
 
-
 int
 open_ioat(const char *value)
 {
@@ -129,7 +128,7 @@  ioat_transfer_data_cb(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
 		struct rte_vhost_async_status *opaque_data, uint16_t count)
 {
 	uint32_t i_desc;
-	int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 + VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
+	uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2 + VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
 	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *src = NULL;
 	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *dst = NULL;
 	unsigned long i_seg;
@@ -182,10 +181,17 @@  ioat_check_completed_copies_cb(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
 		unsigned short mask = MAX_ENQUEUED_SIZE - 1;
 		unsigned short i;
 
-		int dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
+		uint16_t dev_id = dma_bind[vid].dmas[queue_id * 2
 				+ VIRTIO_RXQ].dev_id;
 		n_seg = rte_ioat_completed_ops(dev_id, 255, dump, dump);
-		if (n_seg <= 0)
+		if (n_seg < 0) {
+			RTE_LOG(ERR,
+				VHOST_DATA,
+				"fail to poll completed buf on IOAT device %u",
+				dev_id);
+			return 0;
+		}
+		if (n_seg == 0)
 			return 0;
 
 		cb_tracker[dev_id].ioat_space += n_seg;