[RFC,1/3] ethdev: update modify field flow action
Checks
Commit Message
The generic modify field flow action introduced in [1] has
some issues related to the immediate source operand:
- immediate source can be presented either as an unsigned
64-bit integer or pointer to data pattern in memory.
There was no explicit pointer field defined in the union
- the byte ordering for 64-bit integer was not specified.
Many fields have lesser lengths and byte ordering
is crucial.
- how the bit offset is applied to the immediate source
field was not defined and documented
- 64-bit integer size is not enough to provide MAC and
IPv6 addresses
In order to cover the issues and exclude any ambiguities
the following is done:
- introduce the explicit pointer field
in rte_flow_action_modify_data structure
- replace the 64-bit unsigned integer with 16-byte array
- update the modify field flow action documentation
[1] commit 73b68f4c54a0 ("ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action")
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
---
doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 8 ++++++++
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst | 7 +++++++
lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 15 ++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
@@ -2835,6 +2835,14 @@ a packet to any other part of it.
``value`` sets an immediate value to be used as a source or points to a
location of the value in memory. It is used instead of ``level`` and ``offset``
for ``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE`` and ``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER`` respectively.
+The data in memory should be presented exactly in the same byte order and
+length as in the relevant flow item, i.e. data for field with type
+RTE_FLOW_FIELD_MAC_DST should follow the conventions of dst field
+in rte_flow_item_eth structure, with type RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_SRC -
+rte_flow_item_ipv6 conventions, and so on. The bitfield exatracted from the
+memory being applied as second operation parameter is defined by width and
+the destination field offset. If the field size is large than 16 bytes the
+pattern can be provided as pointer only.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_modify_field:
@@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ API Changes
Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
=======================================================
+* ethdev: ``rte_flow_action_modify_data`` structure udpdated, immediate data
+ array is extended, data pointer field is explicitly added to union, the
+ action behavior is defined in more strict fashion and documentation uddated.
+
ABI Changes
-----------
@@ -101,6 +105,9 @@ ABI Changes
=======================================================
+* ethdev: ``rte_flow_action_modify_data`` structure udpdated.
+
+
Known Issues
------------
@@ -3204,6 +3204,9 @@ enum rte_flow_field_id {
};
/**
+ * @warning
+ * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior notice
+ *
* Field description for MODIFY_FIELD action.
*/
struct rte_flow_action_modify_data {
@@ -3217,10 +3220,16 @@ struct rte_flow_action_modify_data {
uint32_t offset;
};
/**
- * Immediate value for RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE or
- * memory address for RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER.
+ * Immediate value for RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE, presented in the
+ * same byte order and length as in relevant rte_flow_item_xxx.
*/
- uint64_t value;
+ uint8_t value[16];
+ /*
+ * Memory address for RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER, memory layout
+ * should be the same as for relevant field in the
+ * rte_flow_item_xxx structure.
+ */
+ void *pvalue;
};
};