[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 12/15] mbuf: rename data address helpers to IOVA

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Mon Nov 6 17:03:33 CET 2017


06/11/2017 16:56, Olivier MATZ:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 02:41:38AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The following inline functions and macros have been renamed to be
> > consistent with the IOVA wording:
> > 
> > rte_mbuf_data_dma_addr         -> rte_mbuf_data_iova
> > rte_mbuf_data_dma_addr_default -> rte_mbuf_data_iova_default
> > rte_pktmbuf_mtophys            -> rte_pktmbuf_iova
> > rte_pktmbuf_mtophys_offset     -> rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset
> > 
> > The deprecated functions and macros are kept to avoid breaking the API.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> 
> Same here, there are some remaining references after I apply the patches
> (maybe we are not on the same base commit id).
> 
> $ git grep 'mbuf.*phys'
> ...
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c:     fprintf(f, "dump mbuf at %p, phys=%"PRIx64", buf_len=%u\n",
> ...
> test/test/test_cryptodev.h:pktmbuf_mtophys_offset(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf, int offset) {
> test/test/test_cryptodev.h:             printf("pktmbuf_mtophys_offset: offset out of buffer\n");
> test/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c:                         pktmbuf_mtophys_offset(iobuf,
> test/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c:                         pktmbuf_mtophys_offset(sym_op->m_src,

You are right.
I will fix those occurences.
Thanks for the review.


More information about the dev mailing list