[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] drivers/raw: introduce skeleton rawdev driver
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Tue Jan 16 11:34:18 CET 2018
16/01/2018 11:21, Shreyansh Jain:
> On Monday 15 January 2018 04:24 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 02/01/2018 13:57, Shreyansh Jain:
> >> +struct skeleton_firmware {
> >> + struct skeleton_firmware_version_info firmware_version;
> >> + /**< Device firmware information */
> >> + enum skeleton_firmware_state firmware_state;
> >> + /**< Device state */
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +#define SKELETON_MAX_ATTRIBUTES 10
> >> +#define SKELETON_ATTRIBUTE_NAME_MAX 20
> >> +
> >> +struct skeleton_rawdev_attributes {
> >> + char *name;
> >> + /**< Name of the attribute */
> >> + uint64_t value;
> >> + /**< Value or reference of value of attribute */
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +#define SKELETON_CAPA_FW_LOAD 0x0001
> >> +/**< Device supports firmware loading/unloading */
> >> +#define SKELETON_CAPA_FW_RESET 0x0002
> >> +/**< Device supports firmware reset */
> >> +#define SKELETON_CAPA_QUEUES 0x0004
> >> +/**< Device support queue based communication */
> >
> > Comment about the style. The style is important :)
> > You are always writing comments after the item.
>
> Yes, I was trying to stick to single method - postfix.
>
> > When comments are on a separate line, I think it is preferred to write
> > them *before* the item they describe.
> >
>
> Consider this:
>
> struct dummy {
> int a; /**< a postfix comment */
> /**< a prefix comment */
> int b;
> };
>
> Personally, Even I prefer prefix when it comes to full line comments -
> but mixing prefix and postfix can lead to non-readable code.
>
> Anyways - I was referring [1]
>
> [1]
> http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/documentation.html#doxygen-guidelines
>
> and it seems that I should change all to prefix in case any comment in
> the structure is not fitting into a single line.
> I will do that.
OK thanks
More information about the dev
mailing list