[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16] app/testpmd: support multi-process

Singh, Aman Deep aman.deep.singh at intel.com
Mon Aug 16 20:12:14 CEST 2021


On 8/2/2021 1:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 02/08/2021 03:51, Min Hu (Connor):
>> 在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>>> 在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>>> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>>>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd.
>>>>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd
>>>>>>> processes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     * the primary process:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \
>>>>>>>       --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     * the secondary process:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \
>>>>>>>       --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun at huawei.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li at intel.com>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> V16:
>>>>>>> * revert unrelated changes.
>>>>>>> * add some restrictions in doc.
>>>>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Thomas,
>>>>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by".
>>>>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her,
>>>>> please check it out, thanks.
>>>> Andrew's comment from v15:
>>>> "
>>>> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to
>>>> consider is a start point to be applied.
>>>> "
>>> Hi, Andrew, Thomos,
>>>       What is the least thing should be done for this patch to
>>> meet the state sufficient to be applied?
>> Hi, all,
>> 	How about this patch, could it be applied?
> I was not confident enough to apply it in 21.08.
> When others will be back, we'll discuss it again for 21.11.
>
For 21.11 release.

Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>



More information about the dev mailing list