[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16] app/testpmd: support multi-process

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 8/16/2021 7:12 PM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote:
> 
> On 8/2/2021 1:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 02/08/2021 03:51, Min Hu (Connor):
>>> 在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>>>> 在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>>>> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>>>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>>>>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>>>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd.
>>>>>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd
>>>>>>>> processes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    * the primary process:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \
>>>>>>>>      --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    * the secondary process:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \
>>>>>>>>      --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun at huawei.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li at intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> V16:
>>>>>>>> * revert unrelated changes.
>>>>>>>> * add some restrictions in doc.
>>>>>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, Thomas,
>>>>>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by".
>>>>>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her,
>>>>>> please check it out, thanks.
>>>>> Andrew's comment from v15:
>>>>> "
>>>>> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to
>>>>> consider is a start point to be applied.
>>>>> "
>>>> Hi, Andrew, Thomos,
>>>>      What is the least thing should be done for this patch to
>>>> meet the state sufficient to be applied?
>>> Hi, all,
>>> 	How about this patch, could it be applied?
>> I was not confident enough to apply it in 21.08.
>> When others will be back, we'll discuss it again for 21.11.
>>
> For 21.11 release.
> 
> Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>
> 

Hi Connor,

Can you please rebase it to latest dpdk (v21.11-rc0) so we can proceed with it?

I am for getting the patch as early as possible in the release cycle, specially
before it is getting busy for -rc1.

Thanks,
ferruh