[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16] app/testpmd: support multi-process

[Min Hu (Connor)]

Thanks Ferruh, I will handle it as quickly as possible.

在 2021/8/24 20:18, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 8/16/2021 7:12 PM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote:
>>
>> On 8/2/2021 1:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 02/08/2021 03:51, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>> 在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>>>>> 在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>>>>> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>>>>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>>>>>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>>>>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd.
>>>>>>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd
>>>>>>>>> processes:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     * the primary process:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \
>>>>>>>>>       --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     * the secondary process:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \
>>>>>>>>>       --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun at huawei.com>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li at intel.com>
>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
>>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> V16:
>>>>>>>>> * revert unrelated changes.
>>>>>>>>> * add some restrictions in doc.
>>>>>>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi, Thomas,
>>>>>>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by".
>>>>>>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her,
>>>>>>> please check it out, thanks.
>>>>>> Andrew's comment from v15:
>>>>>> "
>>>>>> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to
>>>>>> consider is a start point to be applied.
>>>>>> "
>>>>> Hi, Andrew, Thomos,
>>>>>       What is the least thing should be done for this patch to
>>>>> meet the state sufficient to be applied?
>>>> Hi, all,
>>>> 	How about this patch, could it be applied?
>>> I was not confident enough to apply it in 21.08.
>>> When others will be back, we'll discuss it again for 21.11.
>>>
>> For 21.11 release.
>>
>> Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>
>>
> 
> Hi Connor,
> 
> Can you please rebase it to latest dpdk (v21.11-rc0) so we can proceed with it?
> 
> I am for getting the patch as early as possible in the release cycle, specially
> before it is getting busy for -rc1.
> 
> Thanks,
> ferruh
> .
>