[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: clarify flow action PORT ID semantics

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Mon Jun 7 18:07:54 CEST 2021


07/06/2021 15:21, Ilya Maximets:
> On 6/7/21 2:08 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
> >> On 6/7/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> I see emails don't work well to conclude on how to manage representors.
> >>> I propose working in live meetings so we can try to align our views on
> >>> a virtual whiteboard and interactively ask questions.
> >>> Participants in those meetings could work on documenting what is the
> >>> view of a representor as a first step.
> >>> Second step, it should be easier to discuss the API.
> >>>
> >>> If you agree, I will plan a first meeting where we can discuss what is
> >>> a representor in our opinions.
> >>> The meeting time would be 4pm UTC.
> >>> For the day, I would propose this Thursday 10 if it works for
> >>> everybody involved.
> 
> Second half of the day (CET) is pretty much booked in my calendar.  Tuesday
> or Wednesday might work on this week.  Wednesday or Thursday might work on
> next week.
> 
> >> OK for me.
> > O.K. for me too.

OK let's decide with a poll please:
https://framadate.org/PAP3t8ycqx3lEUfe




More information about the dev mailing list