[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: clarify flow action PORT ID semantics

[Thomas Monjalon]

07/06/2021 18:07, Thomas Monjalon:
> 07/06/2021 15:21, Ilya Maximets:
> > On 6/7/21 2:08 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > > From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
> > >> On 6/7/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >>> I see emails don't work well to conclude on how to manage representors.
> > >>> I propose working in live meetings so we can try to align our views on
> > >>> a virtual whiteboard and interactively ask questions.
> > >>> Participants in those meetings could work on documenting what is the
> > >>> view of a representor as a first step.
> > >>> Second step, it should be easier to discuss the API.
> > >>>
> > >>> If you agree, I will plan a first meeting where we can discuss what is
> > >>> a representor in our opinions.
> > >>> The meeting time would be 4pm UTC.
> > >>> For the day, I would propose this Thursday 10 if it works for
> > >>> everybody involved.
> > 
> > Second half of the day (CET) is pretty much booked in my calendar.  Tuesday
> > or Wednesday might work on this week.  Wednesday or Thursday might work on
> > next week.
> > 
> > >> OK for me.
> > > O.K. for me too.
> 
> OK let's decide with a poll please:
> https://framadate.org/PAP3t8ycqx3lEUfe

Only 5 people voting.
We will be at least 4 tomorrow Wednesday 3pm UTC.
Everybody is welcome to join the community meeting:
	https://zoom.us/j/93391811485

We could try another session on Thursday 4pm UTC if needed.
	https://zoom.us/j/92425132629

Note: we will use Zoom which offers a whiteboard.