patch 'cryptodev: fix RSA key type name' has been queued to stable release 20.11.5
David Marchand
david.marchand at redhat.com
Wed Mar 16 09:06:32 CET 2022
Hello Luca, Kevin, Christian,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:21 PM <luca.boccassi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] cryptodev: fix RSA key type name
>
> [ upstream commit 3387912f5cacd934594f2c7a0c34eda7279419a8 ]
>
> This patch fixes misspelled RTE_RSA_KEY_TYPE_QT,
> this will prevent checkpach from complaining wherever
> change to RSA is being made.
>
> Fixes: 26008aaed14c ("cryptodev: add asymmetric xform and op definitions")
>
> Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal at intel.com>
> Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil at marvell.com>
This patch triggers a warning from libabigail in UNH tests for 20.11 and 21.11:
type of 'anonymous
data member union {rte_crypto_rsa_xform rsa; rte_crypto_modex_xform
modex; rte_crypto_modinv_xform modinv; rte_crypto_dh_xform dh;
rte_crypto_dsa_xform dsa; rte_crypto_ec_xform ec;}' changed:
type size hasn't changed
1 data member change:
type of
'rte_crypto_rsa_xform rsa' changed:
type size hasn't changed
1 data member change:
type of
'rte_crypto_rsa_priv_key_type key_type' changed:
type size
hasn't changed
1
enumerator deletion:
'rte_crypto_rsa_priv_key_type::RTE_RSA_KET_TYPE_QT' value '1'
1
enumerator insertion:
'rte_crypto_rsa_priv_key_type::RTE_RSA_KEY_TYPE_QT' value '1'
type size hasn't changed
Error: ABI issue reported for 'abidiff --suppr
dpdk/devtools/libabigail.abignore --no-added-syms --headers-dir1
reference/include --headers-dir2 build_install/include
reference/dump/librte_ipsec.dump build_install/dump/librte_ipsec.dump'
ABIDIFF_ABI_CHANGE, this change requires a review (abidiff flagged
this as a potential issue).
This API is experimental, so changes are acceptable, but we are
missing a suppression rule similar to what is in the main repo:
; Ignore changes to rte_crypto_asym_op, asymmetric crypto API is experimental
[suppress_type]
name = rte_crypto_asym_op
Note to Thomas and myself: the next time we clean those rules, the
suppression rule on asymmetric crypto should be kept if still
experimental.
--
David Marchand
More information about the stable
mailing list