[PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: fix vq use after free on NUMA reallocation

Maxime Coquelin maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Wed Sep 14 11:34:11 CEST 2022



On 9/14/22 11:15, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 14/09/2022 09:14, Maxime Coquelin:
>> On 9/14/22 03:05, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>>>> On 7/26/22 09:55, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>> The bug this patch is fixing is being reproduced downstream.
>>>> It would be great it gets merged in main branch rapidly so that we can
>>>> perform the backport.
>>>>
>>>> Chenbo, are you planning a pull request for vhost/virtio in the next few
>>>> days? If not, should the main branch maintainer pick this single patch
>>>> directly and let the rest of the series more time for reviews?
>>>
>>> Based on the status of all patches in the list, I guess PR will not happen
>>> this week. So it will be good if David/Thomas can directly pick up this.
>>
>> OK, sounds good to me.
>>
>> Thomas/David, is that good on your side?
> 
> Is there a blocker to merge the whole series?

No, I reviewed the whole series.

But other patches are an enhancement, so it would not hurt to have more
reviews.

I am fine either way.

Thanks,
Maxime



More information about the stable mailing list