[PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: fix vq use after free on NUMA reallocation

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Wed Sep 14 11:45:48 CEST 2022


14/09/2022 11:34, Maxime Coquelin:
> 
> On 9/14/22 11:15, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 14/09/2022 09:14, Maxime Coquelin:
> >> On 9/14/22 03:05, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
> >>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> >>>> On 7/26/22 09:55, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >>>> The bug this patch is fixing is being reproduced downstream.
> >>>> It would be great it gets merged in main branch rapidly so that we can
> >>>> perform the backport.
> >>>>
> >>>> Chenbo, are you planning a pull request for vhost/virtio in the next few
> >>>> days? If not, should the main branch maintainer pick this single patch
> >>>> directly and let the rest of the series more time for reviews?
> >>>
> >>> Based on the status of all patches in the list, I guess PR will not happen
> >>> this week. So it will be good if David/Thomas can directly pick up this.
> >>
> >> OK, sounds good to me.
> >>
> >> Thomas/David, is that good on your side?
> > 
> > Is there a blocker to merge the whole series?
> 
> No, I reviewed the whole series.
> 
> But other patches are an enhancement, so it would not hurt to have more
> reviews.
> 
> I am fine either way.

I prefer not breaking series.
How urgent is it? Should I merge it today?




More information about the stable mailing list